Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Dawsons Creek > Re: When DC wen...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 40 Topic 199 of 292
Post > Topic >>

Re: When DC went downhill

by Seaclock <seaclock@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 14, 2004 at 03:22 AM

"Rob Jensen" <ShutUpRob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2j1mmjFsj3f6U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I thought that the Dawson-Gretchen storyline in s4 made up for the
>>mistakes the writers made with Pacey and Joey that season.

Was Gretchen or an older sister ever mentioned at any time during the 
previous seasons?  It was, in a way, too cliché to bring in this new 
sister just when another irritation between Pacey and Dawson was needed. 
  Having said that, though, I actually didn't mind the Dawson-Gretchen 
storyline, certainly no more than any of the other storylines.  (When 
you say "mistakes the writers made with Pacey and Joey that season" do 
you mean the P-J storyline was a mistake or it was just mishandled?  I 
didn't like the storyline but it was a necessary complication on the 
road to what many of us thought was the ultimate Dawson-Joey 
reconciliation.  As a diversion I thought it was mishandled.  The 
writers made Pacey pretty unlikeable and I rarely thought he and Joey 
seemed natural together.)

>>Joey darn near jumped the shark as a
>>character with the mugging episode,

Awful, unnecessary episode.

>>I thought Mitch's death in s5
>>played rather well in retrospect and helped to fuel the rest of Dawson's
>>arc quite nicely.

I too thought the death story was well-done.  Not sure it was smart to 
hook him up with Jen afterward though the dinner episode was priceless, 
thanks in no small part to Audrey.

>>I've read that part of
>>the problem was that the s6 renewal was unexpected and certain unnamed
>>cast members didn't even want to do it.  And it shows.

Unnamed?  I've read that JVDB wanted his part pared down and maybe 
that's why the show seemed to revolve so much around Joey and that guy 
whose name escapes me.

>>I liked the finale, but wish
>>Williamson would have written either Audrey or Gretchen or both into it
>>rather than stick with just the characters he'd created -- especially
>>since Stupin had been telegraphing since at least as early as the s4
>>finale that they were going to jump 5 years ahead in the timeline at
>>some point.

Hmmm, I've never been sure about this "five years later" thing.  It felt 
rushed, the conclusion was unsatisfying -- I think no matter which way 
you wanted it to go -- and I'm not really sure why it was necessary to 
skip ahead five years.  When you consider that there were still two more 
years of college to go when the regular series ended, was it realistic 
to think they would all have such settled lives only three years after 
graduation?  Yes, I know this is TV-land where things don't have to be 
sensible but...  It felt a little like an episode of "Thirtysomething."

And Sharpe Fan wrote:

> I hate the Dawson Leery character

What is it exactly that people hate about him?  Too moody?  Too 
self-centered?  I've never thought him particularly worse than any of 
the others except that he seemed almost entirely humorless except for 
the birthday episode when he and Andie sang.  I found Pacey more 
consistently unlikeable except when he was with Andie who seemed to 
really make him ****ne.  He was intelligent and noble whereas with Joey, 
the woman who was supposed to make him a better man, he turned into an 
academic flunky and and a surly, discontented boyfriend.

> As for the finale, I was a P/J ****pper, but TPTB laid no basis for Joey
> getting together with Pacey (or Dawson).  I am happy with the result,
but
> felt I was cheated out of seeing how it happened.

I've talked about this before but the whole idea of there having to be a 
"Dawson or Pacey?" question to be resolved was so unrealistic.  After 
all this time when their lives would have changed enormously, what on 
earth would Joey be doing running back to either of her high school 
boyfriends?  They all would have moved on to other people and the most 
realistic thing would have been a few days in Capeside when they would 
have caught up, reminisced, maybe talked about what might have been, but 
still they would have gone back to other things.  BUT, that's not what 
the series was about and so I found the P-J ending unsatisfying.  KW 
originally wrote a D-J finale but felt sorry for Pacey who was left 
alone (Meredith Monroe was not available for the necessary time it would 
have taken to re-establish Andie in Pacey's life) so he rewrote it.  As 
I said above, the finale seemed rushed to me.

Seaclock
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-12 02:07:52 
Re: When DC went downhill
mbg <womblekewl@[EMAIL  2004-06-12 10:39:42 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-12 17:50:35 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-14 00:28:57 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-14 03:22:15 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-14 03:13:07 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-15 04:05:39 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-15 17:51:21 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-16 02:26:21 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-16 02:50:36 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-17 02:57:10 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-17 00:50:05 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-18 02:29:13 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-18 03:09:47 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-18 19:00:19 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-19 03:46:30 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-17 13:59:25 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-18 02:25:58 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-18 03:12:59 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-14 14:32:31 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-14 15:31:31 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-14 17:31:11 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-15 03:38:12 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-15 14:15:38 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-15 20:37:58 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-15 21:40:08 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-15 17:37:53 
Re: When DC went downhill
Seaclock <seaclock@[EM  2004-06-16 01:56:40 
Re: When DC went downhill
Brian Brady <bradyfan@  2005-09-01 21:15:02 
Re: When DC went downhill
Brian Brady <bradyfan@  2005-09-01 21:11:56 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2005-09-02 14:45:06 
Re: When DC went downhill
Brian Brady <bradyfan@  2005-09-01 21:08:27 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-15 18:15:53 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-16 02:17:03 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-17 00:18:10 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-17 00:36:00 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-17 14:14:42 
Re: When DC went downhill
Brian Brady <bradyfan@  2005-09-01 21:07:08 
Re: When DC went downhill
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2004-06-14 03:19:30 
Re: When DC went downhill
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2004-06-14 14:57:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 5:57:34 CDT 2008.