On Mar 19, 7:10=A0pm, suzee <suz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> TAR wrote:
> > The Big Lebowspanglie wrote:
> >> On Mar 19, 2:51=C2 pm, Bonbon <tresbon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> On Mar 19, 4:15=EF=BF=BDpm, The Big Lebowspanglie
<spangliekin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Mar 19, 8:16am, suzee <suz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> And I'm sure the writers write for how `they' think a 4 yo should
ta=
lk like.
> >>>> Suzee, why must you always hammer out these arguments with people
> >>>> about the writers? You don't KNOW the writers. They are not your
> >>>> personal friends or neighbors. You have no reason nor right to say
> >>>> that you are "sure" about anything they write or why they would
write=
> >>>> it that way. Please quit this. You're not sure of anything. You
just
> >>>> *think*, as any viewer would. If Cindi worked at a preschool and
has
> >>>> some background knowledge about this, just leave her be and let her
> >>>> speak on her experience without trying to rile her up.
> >>>> S*Babykins
> >>> Good God, Jen, will you please shut the hell up. Can't you find
> >>> anybody in your neighborhood to take your anger out on? =A0We're all
> >>> tired of it here. =A0And YES, I'm speaking for everybody else.
>
> >>> Bonbon
> >> When your name becomes Suzee, I'll let you know, until then, when I'm
> >> talking to her, you need not answer.
>
> >> S*Babykins
>
> > Don't you keep telling Suzee not to ever respond to your posts and to
> > forget that you exist? =A0If you're sincere, then why do you reply to
> > hers?
>
> I've noticed that. I'm not allowed to reply to her posts, but she feels
> free to comment on mine, even when it's not in response to one of her
> posts, or when it's a thread she's not posted in yet.- Hide quoted text
-
>
> - Show quoted text -
It was about the show and that's why were here. That's the focus of
the NG. I've told Suzee before that if it's not about the show, don't
talk to me because all she does is shout "Troll!". My post to her was
about how she's acting like she's in the head of the writers when it's
impossible to know why they would do something. Suzee has numerous
times (and it's usually to Cindi...she's got some kind of gripe about
Cindi trying to explain or decipher what she sees on the show...it's
like Suzee takes it personally and thinks she can do it better...)
tried to tell Cindi and a few others that *she* knows better about
what the writers are feeling and writing than they do.
I think it's bogus, preachy and condescending, so I've told Suzee
this. She needs to not boss Cindi around. She says "I'm sure the
writers do ____". She's sure of nothing. She doesn't sit around and
have lunch with them and discuss it. I think she's bitchy and tries to
act above it all. My post was about the show. The "Don't talk to me"
posts were bascially saying that if she can't say something that is
intelligent or thoughtful, don't talk to or label me (or my friend) AT
ALL.
I have never read ONE single post of Suzee's where she said anything
thoughtful or intelligent. She just tries to get in the mind of the
writers and say "They wrote it this way or that way because..." as if
she's interviewed them personally or else she's whining and bitching
and labeling somebody a troll. No matter who I dislike, if they can
talk on topic, I'll generally resond whether I like the person or not.
I appreciate that for ONCE Suzee took the limelight off me and Ice and
made a comment about the show, but it certainly wasn't a nice one. She
was preachy and stuffy towards Cindi. I'm sick of that, so I said so.
Deal with it.
S*Babykins
|
