Re: Claire

"Terry Pulliam Burd" <ntpulliam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:idh3u35gvmn8v2ojks7dntdecqkqkdahce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And Nifer and her bud really need to recall that some of *us* recall
> their early animosity. They *hated* each other. Until Michael went
> nuts, anyway (ca. 1999, and maybe earlier than that).

Your timeline is off slightly, I believe, but what you don't mention is
why 
the animosity stopped. You see, some of *US* recall how Bonbon and
EShellzo 
(and others) refused to set the example for JN. Some of *US* remember how 
you all used to (and still do) engage in the exact same behaviors you 
condemn of Jen. I think EShellzo just ended up not talking to JN, and 
eventually leaving the group altogether. But yes, I *STILL RECALL* the
exact 
reasons why I went back and became friends again with JN: because YOUR
SIDE 
couldn't stick to an agreement. You couldnt' leave Jen alone...you
couldn't 
act like the mature side, particularly given the fact that all of you 
probably are older than us by about 500 years combined. A lot of horrible 
things were said on both sides.........ON BOTH SIDES...and it got really 
difficult trying to make the moral distinction between who was "good" and 
who was "bad".

And some of *US* recall a time when Bonbon thought I was cool...a time
when 
Bonbon was openly friendly with me.... but that was only because I was
doing 
her bidding and her dirty work. I was not happy with some of the comments
JN 
had made about others (and myself included). As soon as I stopped feeling 
anger towards JN, Bonbon had no use for me. Bonbon disposed of me like a 
filthy Kleenex she blew DIRTY SNOT into after an especially long, hard flu

season.

But, I think it really came down to this: if JN was half as psychotic and 
predisposed to hallucination as you claim her to be, the charitable, 
Christian thing would've been to change her personality over time with
your 
own acts of kindness towards her...your own long-suffering...your own 
patience.... However, none of that happened, so here is where we find 
ourselves.

> Michael was actually pretty engaging and interesting,
> once upon a time.

That was at  a time when I found the show to be so bad it was interesting
to 
occasionally now. It was bad-interesting. Now it's just bad-boring.

-------------------------------------
Icebreaker
"Hey, you know what they say... See a broad, to get that booty yak 'em."
"Leg 'er down 'n smack 'em yak 'em"
"Cold got to be. You know?"