Re: Claire

On Mar 19, 11:09=A0pm, TAR <tom.r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Once again, Jen, your two eyes don't meet my three. =A0We see things
> differently. =A0You apparently pick up a tone that I don't. =A0


I think that's becuase you WANT to believe that Suzee is too docile
and naive to be a menace and to talk down to others. You don't see it
because you don't want to see it. That's alright, though. Not
everybody is analytical and sees people for what and who they really
are and it's kind of refreshing to know that both types of people
exist in this world. There are those who will ALWAYS give a person a
fair shake and there are those who notice when a person's up to no
good even from a mile away. If we were all the same, the world would
indeed be a very boring place. I'm skeptical of Suzee in other words
and you are not.


Most of the
> time I don't know where you're coming from with this. =A0It's almost
like
> Suzee can say a neutral word like, "the", and you'll interpret it to
> mean all kinds of rude things.


That's an exaggeration. Just because you see it as the glass is half
full with her and I always see it as the glass is half empty because
she waffles and goes back on her word ALL of the time, doesn't mean
I'm automatically gunning for her and would pick her apart just merely
over the word "THE". I don't trust her though, Donna. She called Ice
and I "Masters" and called this "a game to us" and promised the NG
that she would not get "into it with" us anymore and then she went
right back to doing it. She can't keep her word and it's worth
nothing. I have a very keen memory. I don't forget or dismiss things
from day to day. I'll admit that if I did forget and dismiss things,
I'd have a much easier life, but oh well. When a person racks up a
multitude of negative points, they tend to stick with me. I'm not a
"Today is a new day. Time for seconds chances. Clean slate" kind of
person, except with children. I'm too lenient and lax on them, but not
on adults.



=A0All I see is "the". =A0I do know, however,
> that when one *expects* to see something, they'll usually find it.


Past behavior predicts future behavior. I stand by that, but like I
said above, you're more Clean Slate and you don't. So be it. Like I
said, to a large degree that difference is somewhat refreshing and why
I continue to engage in discussion with you rather than fully shun
you. You have a lot more patience regarding second chances than I do,
I'll tell you that much...


> That's how misinterpretations and misunderstandings are born... not to
> mention marathon threads like this one. =A0Perhaps when people explain
> that their intentions were pure and non-confrontational, they should be
> taken at their word.-
> - Show quoted text -


People say all kinds of stuff to protect themselves. I refuse to
accept the lies, especially from Suzee, but you can do as you wish and
wipe the slate clean every day and give her a new chance if you want.
That's up to you and it wouldn't be right for me to stand in the way
of your decision(s) about her.




S*Babykins