On Mar 20, 4:04=C2=A0pm, Bonbon <tresbon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 20, 4:36=EF=BF=BDpm, The Big Lebowspanglie
<spangliekin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > Good God......you've turned this into a whole thread all because your
> > post showed up with a time stamp two hours later?!?!?
> > Geezuslouiseussss.....talk about self absorbed. If you cannot start
> > accepting it and just move on than just email people about it. At
> > least your post showed up. WHO CARES if the time was two hours later?
> > Shit, eat it, accept it and move the hell on, Old Windbag. Sheesh!
> > There are FAR more important things in this world to be ill at ease
> > over. Dang....
>
> > UN-BE-LIEVE-ABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And you have the nerve to tell me to
> > "Shut up already"?!?!? You first!
>
> > S*Babykins-
>
> LMAO at you. =C2=A0Why don't you take your own advice and ignore me if I
> bother you?
>
> BB
Your post about the time stamp didn't "bother me", I rather thought it
was pathetic and chose to make a spectacle of you. It wasn't aimed at
me. It wasn't personal, it was about Google. I don't own or operate
Google, so how could I be internally "bothered"? I thought it was
unbelievable, though, that you took it SO personally that your time
stamp was wrong on your post. It just PROVES to everyone how screwy
your priorities are, really. Pathetic, really. Totally pathetic of
you.
S*Babykins
|
