"Krusty" <rspwkrusty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:br26u6$fv7j$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "NADZILLA 666" <nadzilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > (Oh, yeah...I didn't realize you were talking out of your ass.
Gotcha.)
> >
> > The Simpsons being ****y lately? That one's self-explanitory.
Even
> > most of the fanbois admit this.
>
> Oh, I thought you were kidding. Are you crazy? This season has ruled.
The
> Halloween special rocked. The england episode was hilarious. I think
they've
> had a great season. I don't know that many people besides trolls who
think
> differently.
>
> > TEH JEWS liking money? So? It's like saying Muslims are
particularly
> > missionary in their religion, or that Asians do better in school than
> > whitey. Maybe you'd rather ignore the broad distinctions between
> > ethnic\cultural groups, but I'd rather be realistic.
>
> It's also like saying that all blacks like watermelon and chicken, and
that
> all chinese are bad drivers. Are you comfortable being in that group? I
> mean, if you're *that* guy...more power to ya. Just don't get upset if I
> tend to lump you into that narrow-minded group of idiots who can't
evolve
> past stereotypes.
>
> > The property being valuable? The Simpsons are still on because
they
> > command ****loads of money for FOX. If they weren't, they'd have been
> taken
> > off the air long ago.
>
> Let's explain some very basic principles to you. Real quickly. The
*reason*
> they garner so much money is because people *watch* them. See those
things
> called ratings? They mean people are watching. When people watch (in
droves,
> week after week) it means that they can command the money they
rightfully
> deserve. Now, I'm sure you're familiar with the old, "can't have your
cake
> and eat it too" concept. See, if they're *bad*...then it stands to
reason
> that people *wouldn't* watch (in droves, week after week) and thusly,
the
> ratings would go *down* meaning that they wouldn't be commanding the
money
> they're commanding. I know it's a tough nut to swallow, but the fact
that
> they *are* commanding so much money basically means they're...how shall
I
> put this? "still good". You obviously happen to be in what we like to
call,
> "a very small, vocal, minority". Don't be upset. I'm sure there are
maybe
> two or three people, like Alex Cain for instance, who share your view.
Maybe
> the two of you can have a long 500 thread discussion about how they've
> "jumped the shark" and then pat yourselves on your intellectually
challenged
> backs.
>
Or maybe you could go back to assisting DeJong in his attempt to conquer
the
world through the Internet, and leave this thread entirely.
|
