by "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 13, 2004 at 10:17 AM
Alexander Cain wrote:
>
> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:402C1786.6D26B9EF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Alexander Cain wrote:
> > 1. Discrimination on the basis of past tipping is
> > perfectly legal, even in California, which bans
> > discrimination except for business-related reasons.
>
> This WOULD NOT be a business related reason. This is a bunch of greedy
> pizza boys pissed off because they didn't receive what was OPTIONAL for
> service.
It's business related. Drivers who do not get tipped become
more surly.
>
> >
> > 2. Publi****ng a list of non-tippers MAY violate
> > privacy rights.
>
> "MAY?"
May. They've revealed their address to the pizza parlor.