Kohout's K00Ky Kounsel Gets Bootfucked
Group: alt.battlestar-galactica Date: Wed, Nov 10, 2004, 9:41pm (EST+5)
From: Disgruntled_Self_Storage_Worker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________
PEDOPHILE EDWARD "(e)" KOHOUT'S K00Ky KOUNSEL, LESLIE "TheApostle"
PAULIN, GETS BOOTFUCKED
______________________________________________
From: Mj=F8ln=EBr <mjolner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: Mjolner - time for your bow out
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:49:50 GMT
Message-ID: <6cs4p05edq15mq731a4338igfu2tpsdcfm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
In <MPG.1bfb66b9eec7f973989833@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, on Tue, 9 Nov 2004
23:44:32 -0500, TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Glory ye on this holy date Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:39:28 GMT It came to pass
when Mj=F8ln=EBr <mjolner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hast spoken it in
<r992p0dp1p0fu3r6po6cffd94gttlhn5t0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And thee said
unto news:alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
::
::In <MPG.1bf9ee8038e21b9a989831@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, on Mon, 8 Nov 2004
20:59:20 ::-0500, TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
::
::>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
::>Hash: SHA1
::>
::>Glory ye on this holy date Mon, 08 Nov 2004 06:10:30 GMT ::>It came
to pass when Mj=F8ln=EBr <mjolner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::>Hast spoken it in
<k73uo05uj4g22dm7fo3eal7ks20bgjnhv4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::>And thee said
unto news:alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
::>::
::>::In <MPG.1bf87a8f42630d99989828@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, on Sun, 7 Nov
2004 18:32:17 ::>::-0500, TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
::>::
::>::>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ::>::>Hash: SHA1
::>::>
::>::>
::>::>Ok Mjolner, it's time to put up or take your beating like a man.
::>::>
::>::>Since you have *claimed* it as _FACT_ and by your own dictionary,
::>::>the dictionary you like to use, reaffirms that a FACT is something
::>::>proven on events that have happened, not drawn conclusions as
::>::>you have done, you _must_ provide the post wherein I stated in
::>::>a post that _I_ make 75,000 a year as web-design consultant for
::>::>an ISP. This is the *FACT* you have asserted and by definition
::>::>a fact is only something that has existed or occured.
::>::>
::>::Ummm, I already did that Les. I provided the mid and the quote from
you wherein ::>::you asserted that you earn "over 36 an hour" in your
job as a consultant for an ::>::ISP.
::>
::>Ah yes I read the post wherein you posted the claim which I did state
I make ::>over 36/hr for a consultant for an ISP. However, the _fact_
still remains ::>I did not state in any post that I made 75,000 a year
in any such post(s). ::>Once again these are your drawn conclusions, not
actual facts. Learn what a ::>FACT is before you proclaim it as such.
::>
::Over 36 per hour in a full time job is 75,000 or more per year.
I agree.
::You didn't realize that, because you don't make anywhere near that
much, not ::1/4th that much.
Actually Mjolner, from the first claim you stated as FACT I have denied
that I made any claim of making 75,000. But hey, don't let the facts get
in the way of your lies.
You claimed that you made over $36 per hour. Your other posts show that
you have a full time job, leaving for work every morning at 7:30 A.M.
and returning around 5 P.M. Allowing for commuting that's still > 8
hours a day. You have also stated that you work every day.
Sorry liar, there's just not enough wiggle room there for you to weasel
out. You didn't recognize the number because you have never made $36 an
hour on any job, much less a full-time one.
Face it loser, you lied (you lie compulsively in virtually every post
you make) and you got caught (you get caught with metronomic regularity)
You're too far gone to wake up and change.
I know the psychological type who is a braggart/blowhard/compulsive liar
with low self-esteem and high self-loathing. Do you? You should read up
on it, it's your psychological type. The first step in improving
yourself is being able to acknowledge that something is wrong.
::>
::>Nah, I think that one post will suffice for it's only purpose of
kicking your ::>rosey red ass around the groups some more..
::>
::You lead a very rich fantasy life. The medication hasn't helped? or is
it that ::you forget to take it?
No Fantasy life. You been claiming facts based on your conclusions drawn
from assuptions. You have used multiple sock puppets to fight your
battles wherein I have only used my own nym. It's pretty obvious for
everyone reading who is the mentally unwell person, Mjolner.
You have lied and you been shown to have lied. I don't NEED to use
sock-puppets, but you never stop using them because this is so important
to you. LOL!
You're caught Les- stuffed and mounted, too.
::>::Why don't you just look in your outbox?.
::>
::>This burden of proof must be weighing heavily on your conscience, huh
NARCboi!
::>
::Since it's already been proven to the standards of evidence of any
criminal ::court, you've drowned in your own failed denials.
Which court is that Mjolner...The court of fools?
Any court you are in contains at least one fool. But the evidence is
conclusive as to what you've stated. It's also obvious that what you've
stated is mostly bullshit. The basics, such as when you leave for work
and when you get home are reasonably presumed to be accurate- as your
posting on Usenet doesn't contradict them.
Your ignorance that over $36 per hour =3D 75,000 per year, the fact that
you obviously didn't recognize the association until it was shown to you
arithmetically, is more than enough proof that you don't make anywhere
near what you assert.
In fact you made around 1/5th of that, according to your own posts to
Usenet and the web. So it's all bullshit from you, trying (and failing)
to appear to be more intelligent, educated, and important than you are.
Les, you can't do it. People reading here see how poor your command of
language is. There's no one here who believes English is your second
language, you simply don't have even a high-school graduate's command of
it.
Someone with as low an intelligence as yours obviously is should stick
to the truth at all times, because your lies simply aren't at all
plausible.
Oh, I'm sure they seem so to you- but you're "slow" Les. The rest of us
aren't, and to the rest of us your lies are childishly transparent.
As I have stated already your drawn conclusions based on your assuptions
are not facts. Facts stand up to scrutinty, your burden of evidence is
to happily chortly "check your outbox" and carry on in your own little
"fantasy life" <-- another phrase you lifted from me.
The "check your outbox" reference meant that you, yourself had stated
the item reference. You've snipped what the reference was. <BSEG>
Les, the only thing on earth anyone would lift you from you would be a
head-cold. You couldn't turn a phrase with a tug-boat.
::>::>Now it is time for you, to provide the evidence of this fact or
::>::I already did provide the evidence of it. Whassamatter Les, can't
you read- or ::>::is the arithmetic too tough for you?
::>::
::>::36 x 2080 =3D 74880
::>::"over 36" would be 75000 +
::>
::>Mjolner, what you've done is dug yourself a hole. With my help of
course <EFG>
::
::You couldn't help a colicky baby burp.
Helped you humiliate yourself _again_
In your fantasy perhaps, no where else. Everyone has seen you fall flat
on your face, again. on the first of the many points we will be
discussing. We're not done with those other points Les. We WILL be
getting back to them. It will just go on and on, like a nightmare with
no end... :)
::>You been screeching for the last umpteenth posts that I did claim I
made 75,000 ::>working for an isp and your proof is based on your
"simple arithmetic".
::
::No, I simply scanned the alcohol thread. <g>
Ironic for someone who claims to be scanning threads can't provide the
proof of those claims from the threads he claims he had been scanning.
ho hum, Mjolner get's caught lying .. again. What a shock that is.
You just said absolutely nothing.
"someone who claims to be scanning threads can't provide the proof of
those claims from the thread he claims he had been scanning."
That's supposed to come from a college graduate with a bachelor's in
Psych" ROFL!
The proof is in the thread, which should be in your outbox. In other
words of as few syllables as possible: YOU posted the statement I
referenced, wherein you didn't
Here, I will help you- based upon what you just wrote, wherein I've been
asserting that you claimed you made 75000 per year based upon something
which you said in the alcohol thread. I did post the quote and gave you
plenty of information to help you verify it in your own outbox. That's
where you can see for yourself that you did claim you made over $36 per
hour. The rest comes from your other posts, Les. You work over 8 hour
per day "every day". That's a full-time job, and a full time job at over
$36 per hour would be over 75,000.
You didn't recognize the number and claim you never said you made that
much money, but you DID claim you made that much money. Your claims are:
1: You go to work at 7:30 AM 2: You return home around 5: PM 3: You work
"every day" 4: You are a consultant for the military 4: You are a
consultant for an ISP 4: You are in sales 4: You drive 450 km per day
visiting clients.
4. You sit all damn day at work.
5: You make a salary of "over 36 an hour."
6. You have to wait for your income-tax refund-check in order to buy a
new hard disk drive.
<BSEG>
Well, let's see what we have there, mkay? 7:30 AM - 5 PM =3D 9.5 hours
Every day reasonably means 5 days a week- allowing 1.5 hours per day for
commute- that's 40 hours.
There are no full-time jobs at "over $36 an hour" that don't include
paid vacations, so that's 52 weeks.
40x52 =3D 2080 hours paid per annum (including paid holidays, such as
Victoria Day. <- hint- that's the day of the alcohol thread.) 2080 x
"over 36" =3D 75,000 or so, X #6 - a whopper of a lie by you.
Only too happy to help you out, there Les.
::>
::>Here is where you are put down like the, broken leg, one trick pony,
you are.
::>
::You really should stop pasting other people's lines.
I'm not.. unlike you. geesh you even stole LSD's method of flaming.
::>You have a FACT based on one thing and you presume to call the rest
of your ::>conclusions *FACTS* based on your assuptions.
::>
::What assumptions?
Assution based on hours worked & weeks worked.
::>You assume I work 40 hours a week. Full time hours are 30-40 hours a
week.
::
::You have said that you go to work every day at 7:30 AM.
Actually the quote, my comprehension lacking toadie, is "I go to work
every morning at 7:30 am" The quote does not state I go to work every
_day_ at 7:30 am.
You also state that you come home every day at 5PM
That my stupid, uneducated, little socipathic moron would tell the
readers who read it, that the morning I do work, I go to work at that
time. Not that I do in deed work everyday at that time. See how you are
uneducated and so comprehension lacking.
LOL. Les, read this "See how you are uneducated and so comprehension
lacking." What you meant to say is something like "Which demonstrates
that you are both uneducated and lacking in comprehension."
::Every day is 52 weeks a year.
Why yes, everyday in a year, all 365 of them, would equal 52 weeks a
year. However, that is not what I stated. "I go to work every morning at
7:30am" Now when you have it in the right context and not ripped like
you prefer to distort the truth it appears to _sane_ people that "every
day I work, I go to work every morning at 7:30 am"
No, it says that you go to work every day, and the time at which you
leave is 7:30. Sanity has nothing to do with it Les, if it did you
wouldn't be allowed to post at all!
It's simple English + simple arithmetic + simple logic. All of which are
clearly beyond your means.
::>You do not know what I work nor how many hours I work each day. You
assume I ::>work 52 weeks in a Year. Again, you do not know how many
weeks of the year ::>I do in fact work.
::>
::Every day is 52 weeks, minus paid vacations of 2-4 weeks, depending on
the job.
Is this the whole basis of your "FACTS" ... Honeslty Mjolner you can't
be this foolish to pin all your hopes and dreams on chortling "everyday
is 52 weeks a year" can you. You would appear to be bootfuking yourself
if you are in fact doing that. Reason being is you're once again going
on your "assuptions" based on out of context information and drawing
conclusions from it. Tsk Tsk.
You really are an imbecile if you think that is some sort of telling
argument. You're not a teacher Les, you don't work 40 weeks a year.
::>Now, I did not state I worked 40 hours a week did I?
::
::You are trying to weasel out of a simple trap.
Weasel out of a trap, I would never do that. You don't know how to set
traps. You're simply an idiot who tries desperately to have me make a
mistake, like you are by claiming I stated I work "every day
You have stated that you work ever day and that you leave for work at
7:30 AM.
::You stated you made over $36 an hour, a claim which you stand by.
Yuppers.
ROFL!
::What happened when I posted the $75,000 per year figure is that you
didn't recognize it. ::You didn't recognize it because you have never in
your life made over $20,000 a ::year- and your around 50 years old.
Now who is switching gears here Mjolner. First you claim I did state
that I claimed I made 75,000 a year now you're claiming I didn't
reconize it. That's
Your lack of comprehension is nothing short of monumental!
pretty telling to see you _back pedaling_ on your own claims. First of
all Mjolner, I agree the figure was off but it wasn't that I didn't
reconize it.
You didn't recognize it, that was a clear as crystal.
My position, that I have held since you claimed I stated that 75,000
figure was too prove that you had lied about me claiming it. Secondly
was to prove how you arrived at your lies, and thirdly was to prove how
untrustworthy you really are when it comes to those facts you so proudly
proclaim as true.
What is untrustworthy about saying that you have a full time job, when
you have asserted you work every day and that with the commute it is
9-1/2 a day, every day? Those are your statements and figures.
::>Now, I did not state I worked 52 weeks in a year did I?
::
::Yes, you did. You said you went to work every day.
No, I did not. You're lying _again_.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0From: TheApostle
<likes-to-fuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Subject: Re: TheApostle's lies exposed! (For the
record.)
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 01:36:09 GMT
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Message-ID:
<gc978vc15kfsg6k0373mu935s78rq21ta4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0I go to work every
morning at 730 am.
So what are you going to hang your hopes on now Mjolner? The "every
morning" now to you means "every day" Is that how pathetic you are that
you are going to infer that "every morning" actually to you means that
"every morning" I get up and go to work at 7:30 am. Geesh Mjolner that's
a awful lost of morning to go to work and what if any time will I have
to be getting up on saturday and sunday.. I'm just a damn workaholic. I
guess I must make more than 75,000 a year if "every morning" means
"every day" to you, huh?
Well lets do the math on this one shall we?
36.00 * 56hr/w * 52/w/y =3D $104,832.
W0W Mjolner.. I'm rich by your claims. Since I have been working there
for so long now I must be making tons of dough, huh. Even if I had taken
time off, which of course is paid holidays (4 weeks a year), and paid
sick day's ( two of a month ) and national holidays.. I would _still_
make that amount of money according to your logic.
Jeez Mjolner.. So which is it.
Do I still work _every day_??? <g>
Every day means every work day. That you cannot manage to cope with
common English isn't any surprise, Les. You demonstrate your inability
to cope with common English every day you post to UseNet.
"Every day" in this context of *work* means every work day. In your case
we know it's Monday - Friday just by your posting habits.
::>No. The answer is clear and present. Which when you remove these two
portions ::You have misused the phrase "clear and present"- which you
don't know how to ::use.
Stop regurgitating lines back at me.
Stop misusing them.
Oh wait, you can't! You don't know what they mean, they merely sound
good. Which is one reason why, Les, so many people call you an imbecile,
a moron, a jackass and a stupid idiot.
::>for which you have assumed from your "simple arithmetic" you are left
with only ::>one undeniable fact. I get paid over 36/hr. Nothing else
and certainly No ::>claims of making 75,000 a year. mheh
::>
::mheh right back at you. You have stated that you work every day- If I
wanted to ::search the archives, with your big mouth you would also have
mentioned when you ::get home, too.
Go ahead Mjolner. Post when I get home. Or was this quote you were
hoping to solidify your whole case with. "Every morning at 7:30am" and
"here at 5:00pm".
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0From: TheApostle
<why@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=A0=A0=A0=A0Newsgroups:
alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.cracks,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
=A0=A0=A0=A0Subject: Re: AKULA THE SNITCH --- WATCH YOUR BACKS!!!!
=A0=A0=A0=A0Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:32:55 -0400
=A0=A0=A0=A0Message-ID: <MPG.1730ee96b7b8c5d89896f2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0I'm here from about 5 pm till 1 am.
I have now seen how you once again draw more conlusions based on your
What assumption, that you have posted you're home and online from 5 PM
on?
assuptions. Now I wonder why you would _once_ again draw more
conclusions based on what time I start posting in the group? Does that
mean that I have _just_ arrived home and scurried to my keyboard _just_
so I can see what has been posted about me like you do?
Yuppers. <BSEG>
This doesn't tell you what time I arrive home, only what time I am in
usenet. Which even that is inaccurate since I have on multiple occasions
been home at between 2 pm and 3 pm. Dependant on what time I have to
pick up the little one of course. Mheh. Does this mean since I have
started posting at past 11 pm I have been late at work? Is that what
your little mouse brain logic has got working right now? Well it must be
if you claim that since I stated I am in usenet "here" from about that
time that I must arrive home at that time. And since I am not here I
must be at work. You truly are one self-spanking fool.
Since this is all of your life, you can't base a claim for any existence
outside of it. You've been here doing the same things, at the same
times, for a couple of years. Those things are mainly lying and bragging
and lying- with some threatening and narcing thrown in. Oh yes, let's
not forget the canceling and sporging, too.
::>Those are your beliefs for which you have been so nicely
self-spanking yourself ::>with for the last 30 posts. Your beliefs which
you claim are _FACTS_. Your ::>beliefs that are not true nor are they
based on actual recorded *FACTS*.
::>
::You didn't recognize the figure, because you have never seen that much
money in ::your life.
Blah Blah Blah.. are you trying to make yourself more inportant than you
are again or is it just another one of your socipathic triats coming
out?
You didn't recognize the figure and draw the association because you
have never made that money in your life. That's self-evident.
::>Thanks for taking your beating like a man, Mjolner.
::>
::
::Even a 30 hour week, 40 weeks a year, would, at that salary, be three
times as ::much as you have ever earned in your life.
Read above
[snip parroting flames]
This final piece is inject because I don't care if he responds now.
Proving once and for all how Mjolner gets his _facts_ and what he likes
to call FACTS is and was the overall goal of this ass kicking excercise.
No, I'm not kicking your ass because of that. I'm kicking your ass
because you're a lying braggart without a clue.
So, As you can see Mjolner being in fine form of never letting the facts
get in the way of the truh can't admit being wrong to, like he claimed
he could. When you have, as LSD claimed, a person parroting back your
own flames at you you know you have him beaten and on the run <g>
Unhm, huh. Is that why you ran away 4 hours after we started examining
your claims? <BSEG>
Let's review.
1: You claim you make "over $36 an hour" as - whatever you are claiming
you do
this particular moment.
2: You work a full time job, year-round, as is demonstrated by your
posting
history.
3: You assert you work every day, sitting on your ass- or driving 450
km-
depending on which whopper you're telling at the moment. 4: You have
stated you leave for work every morning at 7:30 AM. 5: You have stated,
and your posting history verifies, that you are home at approx 5 PM
daily.
6: You can't add, multiply, subtract, or divide. You did not recognize
that
'over $36 an hour' in a full time job is <> 75,000 a year. You do not
yet recognize that claiming that you have a full time job that pays you
over $36 an hour is tantamount to claiming you have a salary of $75,000
a year.
7: You inform us that you are anxiously awaiting your income-tax refund
check in
order to be able to purchase a much-needed hard disk drive.
You do not recognize that spells YOU LIED, because you're an imbecile.
Mj=F8ln=EBr
--
=A0=A0____________________________________________
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0__=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0__=A0_____________________=A0_______
=A0=A0=A0=A0/=A0=A0\=A0=A0=A0=A0/=A0=A0\\_=A0=A0=A0_____/\______=A0=A0=A0\=
\_=A0=A0=A0__
=A0=A0=A0=A0\=A0=A0=A0\/\/=A0=A0=A0/=A0|=A0=A0=A0=A0__)_=A0=A0|=A0=A0=A0=A0=
|=A0=A0_/=A0|=A0=A0=A0=A0_
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0\=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0/=A0=A0|=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0\=A0=
|=A0=A0=A0=A0|=A0=A0=A0\=A0|=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0\__/\=A0=A0/=A0=A0/_______=A0=A0/=A0|______=A0=A0/=A0\__=
_=A0=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0______\/___________\/_________\/______\/
=A0=A0=A0=A0_________________________ The WebFAQ Team =AE
_________________________
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0UseNet
the way it ought to be!
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0The
WarezFAQ on the World Wide Web
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0http://warezfaq.com
or http://www.webfaq.org
Copyright =A9 1996-2004 Ragnarok Productions, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction, reprinting, publishing or other distribution or use of
this article without the prior written permission of the author, or the
author's agents, is expressly prohibited.
|
