Talk About Network

Google





Television > ER > Re: They can't ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 15 Topic 4757 of 5016
Post > Topic >>

Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?

by Hunter <buffhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 7, 2007 at 04:36 AM

In article <Sl46j.216574$kj1.143475@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
dgajdgsj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
> OH.  MY.  GOD.
> 
> It's not really possible to brace oneself for the cru****ng 
> disappointment that each episode of "E.R." heaps upon us, is it?  Having

> seen the promo, we all knew we were in for a non-event, but the sheer 
> magnitude of the emptiness of the episode simply leaves me at a loss for

> words.  What the hell was that mess?
----
Then why was it a cru****ng disappointment for you? I do agree it was much 
ado about nothing.
> 
> - The camel was just plain stupid.  No, wait, not just plain stupid: 
> stupid supreme with extra cheese and guacamole.
----
Comedic relief
> 
> 	- Stupider was the fact that the camel "story arc" SPANNED THE
BLIPVERT.
> 
> 	- Nobody needs to see Dubenko's underpants.  Funny factor = 0.0.  Ick 
> factor = 12.7.
----
I was too busy looking at Neela's ass along with her intern. Now that 
could be ***ual herassment as opposed to when he was asking about female 
*** organs the night of his homecoming dance if I recall correctly. 
> 
> - Morris BREAKS FRANK'S HAND TO WIN A BET and NOBODY CALLS THE COPS AND 
> HAS HIM HAULED AWAY?  W.  H.  A.  T??!??!??!?
---
That would be up to Frank to press charges wouldn't it ?
> 
> - Preacher Gal is so uninteresting that I can't even blame Uncle Jesse 
> for preparing to hook up with Sam.  Oh, I'm sorry, I probably shouldn't 
> indulge in such wild speculation, I was probably just imagining the 
> subtle "let's get it on sweet cheeks" doe-eyes on both their parts.  If 
> the TEERPTB know anything, it's "subtle".
> 
> - Who here DIDN'T think Preacher Gal's discussion with Sam at the 
> beginning was gong to end in steamy Preacher-On-Nurse action?  Five'll 
> get you ten that's what they're setting up, mark my words.  NOTE: 
> Breaking my hand to win that bet shall void said bet.
----
I didn't. Word marked and so is this post. We will find out in 2008, most 
likely in the fall if there are no more episodes stockpiled this season.
> 
> - What was with the seance BS?  That was just sad.  Not to mention 
> utterly ridiculous since everybody working the ****ft was in that damn 
> room.  And then one shot of that wasn't enough, we get to have TWO. 
> "Dip your hands in this sterile water for some reason... well, it's 
> sterile until Uncle Jesse puts his mitts in it, but still."  Pfhht.
---
It wasn't a seance, but an e***enical rememberence of the dead that all 
can participate in without religous values conflicting.
> 
> - On the subject of Sam: DAMN GIRL!  This was hands down "Hottest Ever" 
> Sam.  I think it was that uniform.  So I give the episode that.  And 
> only that.
----
I agree with you about that. My Neala is still No.1 though. :-)
> 
> - So... was the dude really drunk?  Did he live?  That smelled for all 
> the world like E.R. Plot Device #5: "Dude appears to be a drunk driver -

> Angry citizen(s) beat on Dude - Turns out Dude is not drunk but has a 
> rare disease/had a stroke while driving - Dude lives and/or dies from 
> beating - E.R. denizens all learn a little something about life and/or 
> death and/or love."
---
Just a head tramua from hitting the steering wheel. Sam tried to explain 
that to the guy who eventually kicked the victim in the head. He lived. 
This happens in real life by the way, that is a virtual lynch mob gathers 
around and beats up what it thinks is a drunk driver but simply groggy 
from a head wound. Sometimes they are killed.
> 
> - So... did the girl he hit live?  Die?  Eva****ate?
----
She lived. Sam saved the day with a paramedic trick.
> 
> - Where the hell was the obligatory Christmas song?  Throw us a fricken 
> bone here!
----
One cliche that didn't appear.
> 
> - And of course I won't even mention that, by my tally, there were 
> nowhere near the advertised 300 patients we were promised.  I'm going to

> stop counting E.R. patients and start counting E.R lies.  I know they 
> far exceed 300.
----
It was over a 24 hour period we came in at hour 12 I think, got to check 
the tape.

It sounds to me you are critizing ER for the sake of critizing. I thought 
it was a good episode with lots of medical drama that many here say they 
want. 

One observation: "Grey's Anatomy" had a ambulance(s) in a collision 
storyline also as a two parter, but far more harrowing in which one 
person was killed and three seriously injured, two critically, all 
paramedics. Not making anything out of it just an observation of a 
coincidence.    
-- 
----->Hunter

"No man in the wrong can stand up against 
 a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."

               -----William J. McDonald
           Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Dropping The Helicopter &  2007-12-07 04:54:10 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Hunter <buffhunter@[EM  2007-12-07 04:36:37 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Snakes on a plane <sen  2007-12-07 11:57:40 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Cory <my_wheel_life@[E  2007-12-12 17:00:33 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Paris Geller <parisgel  2007-12-07 12:05:52 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Cory <my_wheel_life@[E  2007-12-14 12:22:24 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Dropping The Helicopter &  2007-12-08 01:10:18 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Nina Jarvis <Don't bot  2007-12-07 11:41:18 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
"sharon" <no  2007-12-08 08:51:27 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
npardue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-12-07 09:27:05 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
npardue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-12-08 11:04:05 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
"sharon" <no  2007-12-08 20:40:08 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
npardue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-12-08 19:10:36 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Hematochezia <jklompas  2007-12-12 09:29:06 
Re: They can't even do a *GIMMICK* right?!??!?!?
Paul Bearer <Don't Bot  2007-12-12 15:23:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 11:51:18 PST 2009.