"Will Dockery" <dockery@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5b79c$4827bb37$4c49bcfb$18253@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Orson Wells as CitizenCain" wrote...
>>"Will Dockery" wrote:
>>> "Neo D'Artagnan" wrote...
>>
>> >> >> >> > > As for genocide, it's also well known that efforts at
> eradicating the
>> >> >> >> > > Buffalo, Bald Eagle and Boll Weevil have failed miserably.
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > We're as successful at genocide
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Pretty successful according to the definition of genocide -
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > ''...Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean
>> >> >> >> > the
> immediate
>> >> >> >> > destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass
> killings of all
>> >> >> >> > members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a
> coordinated plan of
>> >> >> >> > different actions aiming at the destruction of essential
> foundations of the
>> >> >> >> > life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the
> groups themselves.
>> >> >> >> > The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of
> the political
>> >> >> >> > and social institutions, of culture, language, national
> feelings, religion,
>> >> >> >> > and the economic existence of national groups, and the
> destruction of the
>> >> >> >> > personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the
>> >> >> >> > lives
> of the
>> >> >> >> > individuals belonging to such groups.''
>> >> >> >> > -Raphael Lemkin, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (Wash., D.C.:
>> > Carnegie
>> >> >> >> > Endowment for International Peace, 1944), p. 79.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > In the wake of The Holocaust, Lemkin successfully campaigned
> for the
>> >> >> >> > universal acceptance of international laws defining and
> forbidding genocide.
>> >> >> >> > This was achieved in 1948, with the promulgation of the
> Convention on the
>> >> >> >> > Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > The CPPCG was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly
>> >> >> >> > on
> 9 December
>> >> >> >> > 1948 and came into effect on 12 January 1951 (Resolution
> 260(III)). It
>> >> >> >> > contains an internationally-recognized definition of
genocide
> which [...] defines genocide:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > ''...any of the following acts committed with intent to
> destroy, in whole or
>> >> >> >> > in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
> such:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > (a) Killing members of the group;
>> >> >> >> > (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the
>> >> >> >> > group;
>> >> >> >> > (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life
>> >> > calculated
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
>> >> >> >> > (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the
>> >> >> >> > group;
>> >> >> >> > (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another
> group.
>> >> >> >> > - Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of
>> >> > Genocide,
>> >> >> >> > Article II
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> > ''God's Toybox '' by Will Dockery and Dennis Beck
>> >> >> >> > http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Well, if Wikipedia says so, that's it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Perhaps I should edit this entry? Or write my own? It's The
>> >> >> >> People's
>> >> >> >> Encyclopedia, after all.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I'm people.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sort of.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Sure, that's what it was created for.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Better yet, try Wikinfo, which is the alternative to Wikipedia,
> much
>> >> > more
>> >> >> > free-form in style, and relatively new, which many articles not
> even
>> >> > begun yet..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Because that just makes it a wonderful and informative site,
right?
>> >> >
>> >> > Sure, and enjoyable to work on, also.
>> >>
>> >> Any site you are involved with is doomed to failure.
>> >
>> > We'll see, I suppose...
>>
>> There's no "suppose" about it
>
> Sure there is,
No there isn't.
|
