Re: Well, "Blade" is dead....

Kermit wrote:
> BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <j0nfi2dtgipi491h7dd0dvm5io9foplj8m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Barnabas Collins <BarnabasCollinsonSF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6 Oct 2006 23:15:45 -0700, "Hunter" <buffhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >>
> >>> I haven't posted here in ages but since it is a related subject,
Blade
> >>> has been canceled. Anyone sad to see it go? I kind of liked it but
it
> >>> didn't hold a canal-or a stake-against BtVS, "Angel" or "Forever
> >>> Knight" especially in regards to the "meaning of life" ideals, but
it
> >>> was good fun.
> >>>
> >>> Oh, this is also the second series in a row that hasn't lasted past
one
> >>> season that Kirk "Sticky" Jones has been on. The first was "Over
> >>> There".
> >
> >> I made the mistake of watching it.   I'm glad it's cancelled.
> >
> > See, this is what I don't get. This pervasive attitude on Usenet
lately
> > that "if I don't like a show, then not only will I not watch it, I
don't
> > want *anyone else* to watch it, either."
> >
> > There are plenty of shows I don't like (Grey's Anatomy, for example)
but
> > I'm not actively wishing for them to be cancelled just because they're
> > not for me. Others like them so why shouldn't they have their fun,
too?
>
>
> Maybe he doesn't like to see incompetence rewarded? To be clear, I have
> never seen the show and so have no opinion as to the quality of the work
> being  done, just suggesting where a desire to see a show canceled might
> come from.
>
> I know for myself, it does gnaw at me a little (just a little) that
> shows like Firefly get canceled, while so much badly written, directed,
> acted etc. crap gets renewed.
>
> Why would someone hold a canal to BtVS?
----
LOL! *Candle*. I have to proof read better and not rely too much on my
spell checker. :-)

---->Hunter