In article <Wb-dnXi1srbBJk7YnZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Ray O'Hara" <roh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Jim_*_" <ohyeah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ohyeah-E197B4.17033814022007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <1171472303.093818.263680@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Peck" <Pecktacular@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 14, 3:24 am, "Peck" <Pecktacu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 14, 2:46 am, "karl" <kona-k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > <intangible...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >news:1171421335.407693.200340@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > > > I think the show could find a home on an HBO or
Showtime...then
> they
> > > > > > could really harpoon the major networks about how much they
suck
> > > >
> > > > > How much more critical do you think it would be on Showtime
[owned
> by
> > > > > Viacom/CBS] or HBO [owned by TimeWarner]?
> > > >
> > > > Major Network = "Network Owned By A Large Cor****ation"
> > >
> > > i FAIL at math...I forgot the ! after the =...just because a
> > > cor****ation owns a channel doesn't make it a major network
> > >
> >
> > Whn will you pinheads realize, S60 simply sucks. It's sorkin trying
> > really hard to be the pre-caught with drugs and had to kick them
Sorkin
> > while he the shadow of his former drugged self.
> >
> > It's a pompous uninteresting show that is retreading WW scripts and
> > ideas.
>
>
> you are a pompous uninteresting ass who recycles the same whines you
already
> used for west wing.
> what kind of idiot are you in that you keep watching shows you dislike.
>
>
No the WW was great television while Sorkin was doing drugs. Best thing
on TV in years.
The last 3 years under Wells, sucked big time.
S60 under Sorkin is no better than WW under Wells. Pretty pathetic.
|
