Re: Are you a Simpsons/Futurama lover or a Futurama lover?

On Feb 28, 2:56 pm, artdjmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Feb 28, 5:26 am, Matthew Winn <*...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh, I did understand it. I simply thought that deliberately
> > misunderstanding it would be funnier.
>
> > Evidently not. This is why I'm not a comedy writer.
>
> > --
> > Matthew Winn
> > [If replying by mail remove the "r" from "urk"]
>
> Well, it would be funny, I suppose, if you had been talking to someone
> in real life. You can still be a comedy writer. This is just the
> internet where your intent can sometimes be unrecognizeable.

It's funny after the fact. I didn't understand sarcasm or obvious
ignorance. I mean I thought that was a little much, but I don't know
if a 5 y/o is replying to me or a harvard graduate.