Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Futurama > Re: My theory o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 10 Topic 1008 of 1149
Post > Topic >>

Re: My theory of the series

by Puffin' Billy <sorry@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 31, 2007 at 09:20 PM

That Guy wrote:
> "Puffin' Billy" <sorry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:f3amoo$2cjr$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> At the end of “Anthology of Interest I”, Professor Farnsworth is seen 
>> sitting alone in front of the What-If machine as he says, “So that’s
what 
>> would have happened if I had invented the Fing-Longer. A man can dream 
>> though, a man can dream.”
>>
>> The suggestion here, as I see it, is that the entire Futurama storyline
is 
>> contained totally within the confines of the What-If machine from the 
>> point of view of Professor Hubert Farnsworth. The key point being that 
>> Farnsworth is in the room alone with no one else around at the end of
the 
>> episode.
>>
>> Think about it. As you all know, the What-If machine shows you what the

>> world would be like if you pose it a what-if scenario. During the 
>> preceding ****tions of this episode, Bender, Leela and Fry pose their 
>> questions to the device and in each instance the professor uses a 
>> Fing-Longer to activate it. However, the end clearly shows him sitting
by 
>> himself contemplating what would have happened if he had invented the 
>> Fing-Longer! The contraption has shown him a scenario that included all
of 
>> the Planet Express crew and their questions to the machine. The
Professor 
>> views alternate scenarios involving these characters but in the end the

>> characters were never there.
>>
>> The Professor’s invention shows tales that are “out of series canon” so

>> the ending seemingly proves my point that what Farnsworth has just
viewed 
>> is not “series reality”. The only thing that is real is the solitary 
>> figure of Hubert Farnsworth in an empty room.  Fry, Leela and all the
rest 
>> are only creations of the apparatus.
>>
>>
>>
>> Comments?
> 
> Yeah.  There's a reason crystal meth is illegal.  Doing too much of it
can 
> cause you to hyper-analyze or over-speculate so much your brain starts
to 
> self-destruct. 
> 
> 

First one guy says I need beer and now you are accusing me of using 
drugs. I'm just trying to stir up some debate about the series in this 
dead, dead newsgroup. I guess it's pointless to post here.

So long, jerkass.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-05-26 21:26:48 
Re: My theory of the series
Matthew Winn <*@[EMAIL  2007-05-27 11:50:14 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-05-31 17:19:15 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-05-31 21:20:35 
Re: My theory of the series
"R Flowers" <  2007-05-31 23:00:53 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-06-01 06:46:41 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-06-01 17:38:44 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-06-01 19:29:30 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-06-03 03:28:43 
Re: My theory of the series
"R Flowers" <  2007-05-31 23:00:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 6:01:41 CST 2008.