Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Futurama > Re: My theory o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 10 Topic 1008 of 1135
Post > Topic >>

Re: My theory of the series

by "That Guy" <7@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 1, 2007 at 05:38 PM

"Puffin' Billy" <sorry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:f3ns90$2v1j$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That Guy wrote:
>> "Puffin' Billy" <sorry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:f3amoo$2cjr$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> At the end of “Anthology of Interest I”, Professor Farnsworth is seen 
>>> sitting alone in front of the What-If machine as he says, “So that’s 
>>> what would have happened if I had invented the Fing-Longer. A man can 
>>> dream though, a man can dream.”
>>>
>>> The suggestion here, as I see it, is that the entire Futurama
storyline 
>>> is contained totally within the confines of the What-If machine from
the 
>>> point of view of Professor Hubert Farnsworth. The key point being that

>>> Farnsworth is in the room alone with no one else around at the end of 
>>> the episode.
>>>
>>> Think about it. As you all know, the What-If machine shows you what
the 
>>> world would be like if you pose it a what-if scenario. During the 
>>> preceding ****tions of this episode, Bender, Leela and Fry pose their 
>>> questions to the device and in each instance the professor uses a 
>>> Fing-Longer to activate it. However, the end clearly shows him sitting

>>> by himself contemplating what would have happened if he had invented
the 
>>> Fing-Longer! The contraption has shown him a scenario that included
all 
>>> of the Planet Express crew and their questions to the machine. The 
>>> Professor views alternate scenarios involving these characters but in 
>>> the end the characters were never there.
>>>
>>> The Professor’s invention shows tales that are “out of series canon”
so 
>>> the ending seemingly proves my point that what Farnsworth has just 
>>> viewed is not “series reality”. The only thing that is real is the 
>>> solitary figure of Hubert Farnsworth in an empty room.  Fry, Leela and

>>> all the rest are only creations of the apparatus.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>
>> Yeah.  There's a reason crystal meth is illegal.  Doing too much of it 
>> can cause you to hyper-analyze or over-speculate so much your brain 
>> starts to self-destruct.
>
> First one guy says I need beer and now you are accusing me of using
drugs. 
> I'm just trying to stir up some debate about the series in this dead,
dead 
> newsgroup. I guess it's pointless to post here.
>
> So long, jerkass.

ROFL Chill dude, I'm just yankin' yer chain.  Sorry if it wasn't funny, it

was meant to be.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-05-26 21:26:48 
Re: My theory of the series
Matthew Winn <*@[EMAIL  2007-05-27 11:50:14 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-05-31 17:19:15 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-05-31 21:20:35 
Re: My theory of the series
"R Flowers" <  2007-05-31 23:00:53 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-06-01 06:46:41 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-06-01 17:38:44 
Re: My theory of the series
Puffin' Billy <sorry@[  2007-06-01 19:29:30 
Re: My theory of the series
"That Guy" <  2007-06-03 03:28:43 
Re: My theory of the series
"R Flowers" <  2007-05-31 23:00:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 23:03:13 CDT 2008.