On Apr 3, 10:56 am, suzee <su...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dano wrote:
> > Natur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Apr 2, 1:03 pm, "Ubiquitous" <web...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> "Orson Wells as CitizenCain" <noem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>> "Surfing Trucker" <ba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> Now we're selling off our national treasures? What the hell?
> >>>>> "Taco Bell Buys The Liberty Bell
> >>>>> In an effort to help the national debt, Taco Bell is
> >>>>> pleased to announce that we have agreed to purchase the
> >>>>> Liberty Bell, one of our country's most historic treasures.
> >>>>> It will now be called the "Taco Liberty Bell" and will
> >>>>> still be accessible to the American public for viewing.
> >>>>> While some may find this controversial, we hope our
> >>>>> move will prompt other corporations to take similar action
> >>>>> to do their part to reduce the country's debt."
> >>>>> In a separate press release, Taco Bell explained that the Liberty
> >>>>> Bell would divide its time between Philadelphia and the Taco Bell
> >>>>> headquarters in Irvine. It compared the purchase to the adoption
> >>>>> of highways by corporations. Taco Bell argued that it was simply
> >>>>> "going one step further by purchasing one of the country's
> >>>>> greatest historic treasures." The company boasted, "Taco Bell's
> >>>>> heritage and imagery have revolved around the symbolism of the
> >>>>> bell. Now we've got the crown jewel of bells."
> >>>>> What's up for sale next, The Ford Lincoln Mercury Theatre? Unreal.
> >>>> I hope you realize what day you posted that, because otherwise
> >>>> you're a moron.
> >>> Not to mention it's been in circulation since the last century.
>
> >>> --
> >>> It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
> >>> the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
> >>> our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
> >>> for them, it's failing.
>
> >> Dude, when did you add that signature? 2004? Time for a rethink,
> >> maybe?
>
> > I think he's waiting for this war to overtake Viet-Nam as the
*longest* war
> > in our nation's history. It's already the most expensive.
>
> That's because everything costs far more than they did 35-40 years
ago....
Not everything... the cost of the loss of human life is still the
same: priceless.
Tom
|
