by "Default User" <defaultuserbr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 2, 2008 at 11:33 PM
drewdawg wrote:
> With this accuracy in mind I find it hard to believe his bank would
> have allowed someone to empty the account of over a billion dollars
> with just the 4 digit pin. Even if the ATM withdraw max were raised
> in 3000 to $2 billion (up from $500 a day today) the bank should have
> seen the loss of billions in deposits as serious enough to ask a
> question or two.
The PIN was used as a way to identify the account holder, as Fry didn't
have retina scans or DNA or whatever on file. Now, you'd think they
would have rectified that, but there wasn't any indication that it was
an ATM transaction.
Brian
--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
