On Feb 9, 3:29=A0pm, Harv <hdaye...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 5:53=A0pm, "Sandy McDermin" <mcder...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Just.some.guy" <return.em...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >news:In7rj.1955$Wr4.508@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > "Sandy McDermin" <mcder...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >news:we7rj.79$ip3.5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> "Just.some.guy" <return.em...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message=
> > >>news:HV6rj.214$qV2.78@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> Neither one of you know *who* I am, or what I represent, so don't
ge=
t it
> > >>> twisted...and don't front! And *pimped out* does NOT necessarily
hav=
e a
> > >>> ***ual connotation. You ever heard of the cars that are *pimped
out*=
?
> > >>> MTV has a show on it. You might want to watch it sometime. It's
call=
ed
> > >>> PIMP my ride!!!!
>
> > >> This is what was said. "Pimped out" was not meant in a
nonpejorative,=
hip
> > >> way. It was meant to suggest its original context, otherwise why
woul=
d it
> > >> seem like "unseemly" behavior to him?
>
> > >> *****
> > >> DAVID SHUSTER: Bill, there's just something a little bit unseemly
to =
me
> > >> that Chelsea's out there calling up celebrities, saying sup****t my
mo=
m,
> > >> and she's apparently also calling these super delegates.
>
> > >> BILL PRESS: Hey, she's working for her mom. What's unseemly about
tha=
t?
> > >> During the last campaign, the Bush twins were out working for their
d=
ad.
> > >> I think it's great, I think she's grown up in a political family,
she=
's
> > >> got politics in her blood, she loves her mom, she thinks she'd make
a=
> > >> great president --
>
> > >> SHUSTER: But doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped
out =
in
> > >> some weird sort of way?
>
> > >> ******
> > >> Sandy
>
> > > Yeah...pimped out =3D used. And she *is*. Chelsea's going across the
U=
S to
> > > college campuses speaking on Hilary's behalf to *young* adults.
> > > (for tomcervo, young =3D college aged VOTERS, and you don't have to
be=
a G
> > > from the hood to know that...idiot!!!) And it is *unseemly* that a
par=
ent
> > > would want their child to run across America on the political
campaign=
for
> > > them. Would *you* do that to your kid? I know I wouldn't!
>
> > Please don't refer to me as an idiot. It't not hip; it's insulting.
It's=
> > just as insulting as Shuster implying that Chelsea was being used as a
w=
hore
> > by her own mother.
>
> > If it's unseemly for a 27 (almost 28 year old) woman to campaign for
her=
> > mother, who's running for president, then I don't understand what
unseem=
ly
> > is.
>
> > Shuster made a really uncalled for, distasteful, degrading comment
about=
a
> > young woman, while ignoring every other young adult in the campaign
who =
was
> > campaiging for their own parent. Why is that? Why Chelsea? Why
Hillary? =
Is
> > it open season on women at MSNBC?
>
> > You know, people keep talking about the revolutionary, incredible
occurr=
ence
> > of an African American man possibly getting a major party nomination
for=
> > president, but it's been re****ted that more men are sup****ting both
McCa=
in
> > and Obama then sup****ting Hillary Clinton. Why is that? Could it be
poss=
ible
> > that it's something to do with the inherent, underlying, socially
accept=
able
> > ***ism obviously still imbedded in this nation.
>
> > I say, that a woman getting the nomination and the presidency would be
t=
he
> > biggest revolutionary movement in the United States and all this
***ist,=
> > mysoginistic cor****ate media re****ting proves it.
>
> > Sandy- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> bump- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
ping
|
