"Ruby Vee" <rubyvee3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2008031520490643658-rubyvee3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 2008-03-15 01:10:19 -0400, "Zac" <please_post_replies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> said:
>
>> "Ruby Vee" <rubyvee3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:2008031421564316807-rubyvee3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> That Liz doesn't want Lucky to turn her in for hit and run. She knows
>>> she hit *something*, she knows she ran. Whether or not she actually
hit
>>> Sam, she's guilty of hit and run. And she doesn't want Lucky to turn
in
>>> the paperwork for Jake's sake. That mean ole Sam will make sure she's
>>> persecuted for hitting her, and poor lil Jake will lose "the only
family
>>> he's ever known." She tells all these lies, but it's always for the
>>> sake of someone else: Lucky's precious recovery, or for her poor
little
>>> baby. It's never her fault. And how dare that Sam take it out on her
>>> anyway? Sam's just LOOKING for an excuse to ruin Liz's life.
>>>
>>> Nevermind that Liz's actions may have (for all she knows DID) just
cost
>>> Sam untold pain and suffering and her job!
>>>
>>> Excuse me, but shouldn't she have been thinking about that when she
made
>>> the decision to drive while impaired? When she made the decision not
to
>>> turn herself in after she found blood on her car? Somehow, I don't
>>> think her argument would fly if Carly, for example, were offering it
as
>>> an excuse.
>>>
>>> Ruby
>>
>> I should know by now not to try to defend Elizabeth to the Liz-haters,
>> but I can't stop myself.
>>
>> She wasn't impaired. She was over-tired and dozed off. Not an excuse,
>> but an error in judgment that was at worst, negligent.
>
> She'd taken pain killers and a sedative. That's impaired. Furthermore,
> she KNEW she was impaired. She's a nurse.
>
>> Everyone else was either grossly negligent or reckless. Nicholas was
>> physically and mentally impaired and should never have taken the wheel.
>> Carly was distracted by using her cell phone - she should "hang up and
>> drive" - and let's not forget she knew she hit something too, and has
>> done it before - to Elizabeth! (okay, that last part is not relevant
>> here, but I feel about Carly pretty much the way you feel about
>> Elizabeth - everything she does or says grates on my last nerve).
Monica
>> was impaired because she was drunk driving; and, in my opinion, she is
>> the worst of the bunch because of the way she tried to cover it up - no
>> surprise for a Q. At least Elizabeth and Nicholas have displayed
>> consciences. There is a lot wrong with this whole scenario, but
singling
>> out Elizabeth seems biased to me. While Sam truly didn't deserve this,
>> given all that she has done, I have a lot of trouble mustering up any
>> sympathy for her.
>
> Liz is the one who was manipulating the investigating officer into not
> turning in the paperwork "For the sake of poor little Jake, who would
lose
> the only family he's ever known." Nik wasn't doing that, nor was Monica
> or Carly.
>
>>
>> That being said, I agree that the "Jake" excuse is lame in this
instance,
>> and is getting over-used by Elizabeth, Jason, and Lucky.
>>
>> Zac
>> -- who will probably regret opening his big mouth ;-)
>
> Ruby
>
No, Monica was filing false police re****ts and destroying (or trying to
destroy) evidence. I think she was too busy to talk someone into not
filing
charges on her.
LauraH
|
