On Mar 26, 11:09=EF=BF=BDam, Vox <Vectra3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hilda wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 12:11 pm, Lynnbug <Lynnbug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>I was about to say the same thing Vox! =EF=BF=BDLiz is worried about
Sam=
and
> >>she is with Jason! =EF=BF=BDWhat kinda logic is that?- Hide quoted
text =
-
>
> > Well, thus far Sam has put the Liz's kids in danger far more than
> > Jason has *any* of the children in his care through years.
>
> HOw is that an argument in favor of Liz's character???
>
> Vox
It's not an argument for Liz's character but as a comparison between
Jason's and Sam's. Jason would never knowingly put a child, any child,
in danger. Nor would he stand by and watch one being hurt. Sam has
proven that she would do both of those things, which says to me that
she's the greater risk.
PJ
|
