On Mar 25, 7:54=C2=A0pm, "coley" <iove...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "onchee aka onchangel" <onchangel2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:9b90=
6758-f34d-44b3-9397-e04a6be9f640@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 20, 8:44 pm, PJ <pjm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 6:38=EF=BF=BDpm, Ruby Vee <rubyv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On 2008-03-20 20:23:21 -0400, Dana <danamb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>
> > > > And I love it when she's putting the screws to Liz.
>
> > > > (Yeah, this will open another rash of Liz-ba****ng/Sam-ba****ng
posts
> > > > but
> > > > so what?)
>
> > > > ;)
>
> > > They're both reprehensible. =EF=BF=BDBut I so love to see Sam put
the =
screws to
> > > Liz!
>
> > > Ruby
>
> > And, surprise! I hate Sam and I loved it when Liz so rightly pointed
> > out that she can turn Sam in for kidnapping. :-> Sam's so blind she
> > can't even see that she's the pot and Liz is the kettle. And Lucky,
> > still besotted, still falling for Sam's manipulations. Idiot.
>
> > PJ
>
> Yeah, but do you notice that Liz cannot stay out of Luckys business,
> if she would just stay out of everything perhaps Sam and Lucky could
> be happy. Liz needs to butt out.
>
> Onchee
>
> But lucky is making it clear sam will be around the kids and that IS
liz's=
> business. I wouldn't trust her with my kids either
>
> nikki- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
It's strange. When you look at it from one angle, Sam hired thugs to
scare Liz and her two kids in the park. When you look at it from
another angle, she was the one who brought Kristina out of the
darkness of feeling trapped, tragically reserved and completely mute.
Therefore, we know she is capable of being responsible and putting a
child's needs first, but it certainly seems like if the child is
*connected* to somebody she doesn't like, they're 100% disposable to
her, and that's rather discomforting to know; it's an incident from
the past that lingers.
S*Babykins
|
