Re: Jason and Elizabeth - NO CHEMISTRY

On Apr 14, 1:31=A0pm, "ABC_123" <A...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hilda <hilda.alva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:3331a25d-d2c5-4a19-
> 8e34-9ce4e4a39...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 12, 10:15=FFpm, cjcri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (c c) wrote:
> >> I'll always remain a Liz and Lucky fan, they have a great history.
AND,=

> >> I still think Jake will turn out to be Lucky's son one of these
years.
>
> >> Carol
>
> > Yes, the Liz/Lucky love story is a GH classic (well, let's call it
> > modern classic) - but not with the way they're writing Lucky now.
>
> > I really like the Liz/Jason relation****p, I do think they have
> > chemistry - they have a tender passion, rather than the tempestuous
> > Sonny/Carly passion. =A0I also liked Jason with Robin but apparently
> > that isn't going to be resurrected any time soon.
>
> I'm sorry...but CLASSIC??? =A0CLASSIC??? =A0Jason and Liz kiss like old
pe=
ople
> fu*k...awkward, uncomfortable, and mechanical. lol. =A0The two of them
can=
't
> do any natural movmements, they look like two robots when they are
forced
> to touch. =A0
>
> I think it is the worst attempt to have to people act like they are in
lov=
e
> I have ever seen.

If you actually read what I *wrote*, I used "classic" to describe the
Liz and LUCKY love story.