On Apr 27, 1:47=EF=BF=BDpm, "Laura M. Young" <bridgeplaye...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:=
> On 4/27/08 11:00 AM,"PJ" <pjm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > I read somewhere a while back, maybe even a long while, that it was
> > the actor's choice to have such a limited role. He's one of my
> > favorites and I don't think I've ever FF'd any scene with him, which
> > is saying something because I have an abiding love for my FF button. I
> > remember that scene with Skye and his later scenes with Tracy. Good
> > actor. Great character.
>
> > PJ
>
> I think I read the same thing about it being the actor's choice not to
be =
a
> regular, but it would be nice if maybe once a year or so they gave him a
> real story to work with instead of just hanging out tending bar at
Jake's
> now and then.
>
> By the way, did you all know that Coleman's whole name is supposed to be
> "Mitchell Coleman??" =EF=BF=BD I just found that in IMDB. =EF=BF=BDI
remem=
ber him being
> introduced as Coleman Ratcliff at one time, and Tracy called him Buck or
> Bucky Coleman, but I don't remember anyone ever calling him "Mitchell."
>
> Maybe the character was originally created that way, but then they never
> used any other name and by the time they needed a whole name the writers
h=
ad
> forgotten what it was supposed to be.
I just looked up as much as I had patience for on the character. I
don't know the site now (short term memory loss, lol) but I think it
was one of the soap mags that give cast lists etc. It said the
character's real name is *Cole Radcliffe*. No mention of *Mitchell*.
<sigh> I also found an interview from 2005 (again, I think it was
2005) in which Mr. Gibbons said he *wished they would call him more
often*. He seems to be that enigma wrapped . . . . .
PJ


|