Ruby Vee wrote:
> On 2008-04-27 08:35:42 -0400, Vox <Vectra3456@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>
>> You can not be sure what kind of a father someone is going to be
>> unless you give them the chance. No one KNEW AJ would be a bad
>> father...they just assumed it. And given the choice between someone
>> with problems and a MOBSTER, I'd take my chances with the nutter. AJ
>> at least needed the op****tunity to try because it was HIS SON, for
>> crying out loud.
>>
>> They all blew it as far as I am concerned but AJ morally should have
>> been allowed the op****tunity and Robin came forth, fortunately, with
>> the truth.
>
>
> While it is true that no one knows for sure what they (or someone else)
> will do in a situation until they're IN the situation, AJ had stated
> flat out that if Michael were HIS child, he'd take him away from his
> mother. In that situation, I believe that after carrying the child for
> 9 months, Carly had every right to keep Michael's paternity from AJ.
>
> Ruby (And at that time, I HATED Carly and LOVED Robin!)
>
.....and so the eternal debate continues......
Nope. A person, in my world, always has the right to know. It's pretty
hard to "take a child away" from it's mother. That threat isn't a good
enough reason to withhold the information.
Vox
|
