On Apr 29, 5:52=EF=BF=BDam, Vox <Vectra3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Ruby Vee wrote:
> > On 2008-04-27 08:35:42 -0400, Vox <Vectra3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>
> >> You can not be sure what kind of a father someone is going to be
> >> unless you give them the chance. =EF=BF=BDNo one KNEW AJ would be a
bad=
> >> father...they just assumed it. =EF=BF=BDAnd given the choice between
so=
meone
> >> with problems and a MOBSTER, I'd take my chances with the nutter.
=EF=
=BF=BDAJ
> >> at least needed the op****tunity to try because it was HIS SON, for
> >> crying out loud.
>
> >> They all blew it as far as I am concerned but AJ morally should have
> >> been allowed the op****tunity and Robin came forth, fortunately, with
> >> the truth.
>
> > While it is true that no one knows for sure what they (or someone
else)
> > will do in a situation until they're IN the situation, AJ had stated
> > flat out that if Michael were HIS child, he'd take him away from his
> > mother. =EF=BF=BDIn that situation, I believe that after carrying the
ch=
ild for
> > 9 months, Carly had every right to keep Michael's paternity from AJ.
>
> > Ruby (And at that time, I HATED Carly and LOVED Robin!)
>
> ....and so the eternal debate continues......
>
> Nope. A person, in my world, always has the right to know. =EF=BF=BDIt's
p=
retty
> hard to "take a child away" from it's mother. =EF=BF=BDThat threat isn't
a=
good
> enough reason to withhold the information.
>
> Vox- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
When you consider who the two biological parents of Michael were at
the time of his birth, I'd have to say that AJ wasn't one bit worse
than Carly was. Thinking back to the kinds of things she was up to, I
wouldn't want her raising my child either. Neither one of them was
ready to be a parent! Carly was young and incredibly stupid. AJ was
rich and incredibly stupid. But at that point, at least he was
*trying* to turn his life around. Eternal debate is right. Moot is
even more right. :->
PJ
|
