Re: Strike

In article <Xns99E09C6972FC2jayembeesnurcher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
jayembeenospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
> 
> > Still not a good analogy. They want additional money for the SAME
> > car when it trades hands again, down the road, whether there's a
> > profit involved or not.
> 
> That analogy doesn't hold water. For it to do so, the WGA would have
> to be insisting on residuals from the sale of used DVDs (which are
> "trading hands again, down the road"). But they aren't. DVDs and
> on-line downloads are *new* copies, not old copies.

And getting paid for a copy is wrong since they had nothing to do with 
making the copy.