Talk About Network

Google





Television > Gilmore Girls > Re: Gilmore Bit...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 18 Topic 3589 of 3803
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07

by "Nicole Massey" <nyyki@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 12, 2007 at 04:02 PM

"Rob Jensen" <ShutUpRob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:0ib0m3d9ticpjjvlnkcqok7diel8vd5qts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:46:11 -0600, "Nicole Massey"
> <nyyki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>And another thing. I know you're pissed at Alexis because she, according

>>to
>>your "sources," smashed your fairy tale castle, but don't you think it's
>>about time you stopped ragging on her? The show's over, what's done is 
>>done,
>>and it's time to forgive her for her alleged role in ending the series.
>
> Tell that to Michael Ausiello, who keeps re****ting in dribs-and-drabs
> the very incontrovertible evidence.  There's clearly ongoing attempts
> to pressure Bledel to come back for a reunion, and they're going
> through Ausiello.
>
> And FTR, I'm *far* from the only Gg fan who's pissed at Bledel -- I've
> encountered a lot more fans on a large variety of MBs than you
> probably think who came to the same conclusions that I did
> independently.
>
> Also, ASP wants to do the reunion, so the show's not over until she
> says it's over.  Period.

Uh, no. She has to get buy in from a lot of people to bring it back from
the 
dead.  Studios, networks, cast, crew, etc.

As for your getting pissed at Alexis over her making a career decision,
I'd 
like to point you to a song from the Eagles' first reunion album that sums

up my feelings rather nicely. Having other people read into an obsessive 
industry writer's comments (one so obsessive he finagled a speaking line
on 
the show) things doesn't make it factual. It becomes factual when some of 
the involved parties (instead of just observing parties from the
sidelines) 
say it's the case.

I know this kind of spurious logic and information gathering is the norm
for 
the cinematic industry and its pundits, but it wouldn't even make the
grade 
on an episode of L&O or any of the rest of the dreadful police/legal 
procedurals, so perhaps it's time to upgrade ones criteria for evidence 
collection.

Besides, it's moot anyway. Nothing is going to happen until we get done
with 
the WGA, SAG, and DGA strikes, and all indications from the realistic side

of the industry are that this one is going on for a lot longer than most
of 
the unwashed think so. (Yes, you're not the only one with industry
insiders)

I for one applaud Lauren as she follows the footsteps of Patrick Stewart, 
Earl Hindman, and James Earl Jones in keeping food on the table and a roof

over head.  As said in another post, commercial work is not the same as 
commercial voiceover work, and with some commercials paying more than the 
take from two or three episodes for major companies and their ad spots,
it's 
a wise move to make the money and keep working. Like the old joke, What
the 
first thing an actor between parts says to you? "Hi, my name is Lauren and

I'll be your waiter."
 




 18 Posts in Topic:
Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2007-12-11 01:08:03 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Truth Inc.   2007-12-11 11:19:19 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Truth Inc.   2007-12-11 11:23:36 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Cory <my_wheel_life@[E  2007-12-11 10:55:50 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2007-12-11 18:57:00 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2007-12-11 20:23:57 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Mickey <mickey_and_edi  2007-12-11 14:31:44 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2007-12-11 18:57:00 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
"Sharpe Fan" &l  2007-12-12 04:05:26 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2007-12-12 01:46:05 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
"Nicole Massey"  2007-12-12 09:46:11 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@  2007-12-12 13:05:50 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
"Nicole Massey"  2007-12-12 16:02:39 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
William George Ferguson &  2007-12-12 09:32:11 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Abby Lockhart <Send to  2007-12-12 15:19:18 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
William George Ferguson &  2007-12-12 16:53:47 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Nina Jarvis <Don't bot  2007-12-12 15:02:13 
Re: Gilmore Bits 12-11-07
Send to usenet   2007-12-12 14:51:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 19:26:42 PST 2009.