In article <5urqm31ag8481frget1l6s543pmvj4mi5e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Rob Jensen
<ShutUpRob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:02:55 +0100, Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <Xns9A0DB0FA02D4Brspwchadbryantnet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>rspw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>>
>>> "On the Buffy front, there has been something of rather substantial
>>> pro****tion which has been concealed," Whedon posted. "There's nothing
I
>>> can say about this until after January 15th, probably closer to the
end
>>> of that month."
>>>
>>
>>Interesting, so Sarah Michelle Gellar has given up trying to make a
>>break through and skulks back to Buffy, eh? :)
>
>Hey, if the movie shows why and how Dawn became a giant and
>guest-stars Eliza Dushku, then more power to SMG for "skulking back."
>At least SMG would be admitting she made a mistake, which is more than
>Alexis Bledel is doing regarding single-handedly shutting down Gilmore
>Girls.
>
>Also, I don't so much blame SMG for SMG not breaking through so much
>as I blame Southland Tales.
>
> -- Rob
SMG has been in some films, which many ex-TVseries stars do not. And I
think being in a Buffy film is a lot different from being in a constant TV
series. Shorter hours, and it ends. David Boreanz said he would have been
up for an Angel film, but not a series, if I heard correctly.
--
Edward McArdle
|
