Re: HuffPo: How the Gilmore Girls Could Have Helped Hillary Clinton

Xena wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:10:50 -0600, Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> Ha, David!  Neener neener neeeeeeeee nerrrrrrrrrr!  I found this one
>> before you did!  
>>
>> FTR, I think that Hillary's become *much* more likable since (less
>> im****tantly) the teary speech and (FAR more im****tantly) her
>> *****-slapping-with-kindness of Chris "Tweety" Matthews just before
>> the NH primary.  I think Rory is on the wrong beat -- because, much to
>> virulently misogynist, virulently anti-Clinton(s) Matthews, he just
>> handed the presidency over to HRC on a silver platter.  Unless Rory
>> has realized that she's covering the Vice-Presidential candidate and
>> is okay with that.
> I would point out all heck is breaking loose In New Hamp****re, 
> a number of questions have been raised about the results.   Seems
> that in areas where paper ballots were used, the polls were
> dead on correct.   Also seems that in areas where electronic voting 
> machines were used they got the vote for Obama right, they got the
> vote for Edwards right, but they were way off in figures for Hilary.
> 
> Dennis Kucinich has paid $2,000 for a recount.   But recounts 
> can't be done on a number of the electronic voting machines.  
> 
> You haven't heard the last of this.
> 
> Finaly, look at Kenya.   They had a disputed election there
> and riots broke loose.  The US has disputed elections
> and the sheople in this country tolerate it. 
> 
> And this is the country that is trying to pass itself
> off as the model of democracy.
> 

You know, the losers always find something to blame other than 
themselves or the merits of the arguments they advance. As a result of 
Democratic Party complaints in 2000, many precincts changed  to 
electronic voting machines. Now when the expectations of the left most 
leaning folk (their tin hat crowd) are not met, it must be the machines. 
Make up your fricking minds. I can think of at least one explanation for 
why the accuracy of projections for paper vs paperless precincts might 
skew. Without a mapping of precinct demographics to voting modality, I'm 
loath to post it, not that those who buy into the election fraud 
scenario would be really interested, anyway.

The Other Mickey