Re: HuffPo: How the Gilmore Girls Could Have Helped Hillary Clinton Predict her Political Fate

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:57:27 GMT, Mickey
<mickey_and_edith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>You know, the losers always find something to blame other than 
>themselves or the merits of the arguments they advance. As a result of 
>Democratic Party complaints in 2000, many precincts changed  to 
>electronic voting machines. 
Electronic voting machines with no recount ability.  Isn't that 
convenient.

Do some research on the subject including the concept of 
black box voting.  

Add in the charge that the CEO of Diebold promised to 
get George Bush elected (Diebold makes electronic voting
machines.

Oh and add in the thing about running tests on these things.  A number
of groups have wanted to test the voting machines to insure their 
accuracy.  Deibold and others have declined citing proprietary
technology.

Now if we're going to use electronic voting machines I want
a few full fledged elections to test the devices.  Invite voters
to test the machines, invite hackers to try to hack the machines.

A number of election servers run Windows and have beeen
hacked into.

Also a number of people in Ohio voted for Kerry only to
come out of the voting booth with a receipt for a vote 
Bush.   

IMHO we should go back old fa****oned paper
and pen until they prove to me the electronic
systems are foolproof. 

George Bush wants to bring democracy to the rest of
the world.   Here is a radical thought; lets start 
with the US of A.

One of the bases of Democracy is the loosers
have to have confidence in the voting results.

This is one voter who lacks confidence in
our system. 

If you have 24 votes for Bush going into the
machine and 24 votes for Kerry going in I want
proof that they went in and out correctly.   Where the
CEO of Diebold promised to get Bush elected
I want proof that the electronic voting machine
won't return 755 votes for Bush and 10 for Kerry.