In article
<5c159169-3f7c-4bdf-9188-56ebe364303b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Jerri " <Jerri.LaPoint@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spake thusly:
> I think it's interesting that everyone was saying "drug overdose"
> before they even ruled out natural causes via autopsy. Okay, so the
> autopsy was not much help but it will still take days or weeks
> before the tox screens (see, I watch Bones and NCIS and House) are
> completed and a definitive determination is made. I don't understand
> the rush to judgment before the facts are all in.
The man was in his 20s, and apparently did not die due to a car
accident, homicide, or suicide. He was not known to be terminally
ill. He was engaged in a profession that is notorious for a
relatively high rate of substance abuse, and had the money to afford
expensive illegal substances. While this is all cir***stantial, and
he may well have had some hidden medical issue such as a congenital
heart defect, a substance abuse problem or drug overdose is by far the
most likely explanation to fit the known facts.
- Morty
|
