(Mordechai T. Abzug) wrote:
> The man was in his 20s, and apparently did not die due to a car
> accident, homicide, or suicide. He was not known to be terminally
> ill. He was engaged in a profession that is notorious for a
> relatively high rate of substance abuse, and had the money to afford
> expensive illegal substances. While this is all cir***stantial, and
> he may well have had some hidden medical issue such as a congenital
> heart defect, a substance abuse problem or drug overdose is by far the
> most likely explanation to fit the known facts.
I know, I know ... but I would rather have the results of the tox
screens in before reaching conclusions. When I speculate about the use
of drugs among acquaintances, I'm *always* wrong, so I'd rather not
engage in that sort of speculation. I don't like being wrong. I can't
play Scrabble, do crossword puzzles or detect drug use.
Jerri
|
