The idea of a green screen set has been proposed, but as all of the rest of
our sets are practical, and we don't use greenscreen anywhere else, it
would
really stand out. Plus, we'd just prefer to have a real set that we can
interact with.
"Mordechai T. Abzug" <morty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:es-dnQOjMa8pQHTanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Up1Gj.116861$w94.49548@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "First Fallen" <nope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spake thusly:
>
>> We continue to be plagued by the same delays that have had us
>> stalled at about 85-90% finished principal photography for about a
>> year.
>
> It's a very ambitious project.
>
> Is this still about the sets? If so, have you considered fini****ng
> your shooting with a generic set or green screen? You can always add
> the cockpit and other details in post, as CG. The longer you wait to
> finish shooting, the more likely an actor won't be available or will
> physically change in appearance. It's a no-lose approach -- if the
> sets become available before you find someone to do the post work, and
> the actors are still available, you can just reshoot the scenes with
> the sets.
>
> Meanwhile, it's probably a lot easier to find someone who can edit
> video (can be anywhere in the world) than someone who can build sets
> (ideally needs to be physically nearby.)
>
> - Morty
|
