I don't have the Paramount DVD sets yet, so I cannot compare Paramount
vs. Columbia House. I do remember that the Columbia House VHS were
better than the CBS video versions. Columbia House seems to have
access to a really nice set of master prints.
If we want to compare them objectively what we need is stats. What is
the average bit rate for each? Chances are that if one of them is
cramming more episodes on each disc then its avg bit rate would be
lower than the other.
Sean
tootal2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> you get what you pay for.
> >>
> >> And incidentally, their Perry Mason prints were better too. Paramount
> >> did a nice job with it recent release of Volume 1, but the 2-episode
> >> Columbia House prints were much finer. The discs feel more
substantial
> >> in your hands too, which proves a right-way and a cheap-way to deal
in
> >> these things without the consumer ever knowing, and that's what I
> >> loathe about this digital racket.
> >
> > Uh...since you're in love with Columbia House...exactly when did they
> > release the rest of the seasons to finish your subscription?
> > Uh...they did honor and finish your subscription, didn't they, eh?
> > Talk about a digital racket... I don't buy anything until the entire
> > sets have been released.
>
> Paramount hh dvds look alot better. Season 5 is coming out in December:)
|
