Re: H&A encouraging child ****ography

Well I can see where your mind lies! in the gutter. They were acting as 
teenagers do.....not thinking, and as for the photo taken, blame
technology, 
this was innocent fun! I ROARED with laughter seeing them get caught by
Alf. 
You are just making Mountains out of Mole Hills

Randy P ;^)

"Beautiful ****n" <BS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:455d981d$0$28216$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Big LN wrote:
>
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:455d95ef$0$11968$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>Beautiful ****n wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>a segment in tonight's episode of H&A had the old "girls wind up 
>>>>tricking the boys into taking their clothes off" plotline - it's been 
>>>>used before (most notably in Neighbours about 15 years ago - that's
how 
>>>>old it is).
>>>>
>>>>Except tonight H&A writers and/or director decided to get one of the 
>>>>female characters to pull out her digital camera just as the boys were

>>>>about to do the full monty.
>>>>
>>>>don't H&A producers realise that taking a **** photo of someone under
18 
>>>>(in the context of pleasure) constitutes child ****ography?
>>>
>>>It's not the context in which the photograph is taken that makes it
child 
>>>****ography, it's the manner in which the child (being someone under
16) 
>>>is depicted. Since they haven't shown (I assume) the pictures in 
>>>question, it's impossible to conclude that they would constitute child 
>>>****ography. Accordingly it cannot be inferred that H&A are encouraging

>>>it.
>>>
>>>As an aside, the presence of ****ity is neither sufficient, nor
necessary, 
>>>for a picture of a child to constitute child ****ography.
>>>
>>>Sylvia.
>>>
>>>
>>>>why are they encouraging their viewers to do such a thing?
>>>>
>>>>what is this world coming to when H&A is encouraging child ****!
>>>>
>>>>(we already know they encourage young women to have *** with 2
different 
>>>>men and not know who the father of their child is)
>>
>>
>> Both characters are over 16.
>
> child ****ography is ***ually explicit material containing images of 
> people under 18 - not 16 (which is the age of consent in most australia 
> states).
>
>
>
> Rick is over 18.
>>
>> 'Onya