Re: H&A encouraging child ****ography

I don't have a problem with this scene, because I know it was done under 
much supervision, and any "MINORS" would of needed Parents/Guardians
consent 
to do those scenes in the first place, and this is not some seedy back 
street **** flick shop. Which is exactly what you are trying to make H & A

seem like. Why do you watch the show if you don't like it? You never make
a 
good remark about the show.

Randy P  ;^)

"Beautiful ****n" <BS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:455d8de9$0$28209$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>a segment in tonight's episode of H&A had the old "girls wind up tricking

>the boys into taking their clothes off" plotline - it's been used before 
>(most notably in Neighbours about 15 years ago - that's how old it is).
>
> Except tonight H&A writers and/or director decided to get one of the 
> female characters to pull out her digital camera just as the boys were 
> about to do the full monty.
>
> don't H&A producers realise that taking a **** photo of someone under 18

> (in the context of pleasure) constitutes child ****ography?
>
> why are they encouraging their viewers to do such a thing?
>
> what is this world coming to when H&A is encouraging child ****!
>
> (we already know they encourage young women to have *** with 2 different

> men and not know who the father of their child is)