On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:34:28 GMT, "Loki Dog" <arpotvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
waxed lyrical:
>"Todd" <twrexxnospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:h48b93lqvghbimrprnk8rcvrvdud76g7k1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Quick recommendation here: I caught the new Potter flick today and it
>> was quite good. Since the book was so long, they left out a lot of
>> stuff, but they did a decent job adapting such a long work to a 2hr.
>> plus film. Much darker and Radcliffe has really come a long way as an
>> actor. Imelda Staunton is gleefully creepy as Umbridge.
I felt a little disappointed, because so much stuff was cut. I happen
to think OOTP justified its length as a novel, so losing so much
really hurt the film.
It's not bad, by any means, but it should have been so much... longer!
>
>Going to see in about 3 hours. Thank goodness for a mother in law who
>doesn't mind watching my 2 year old so I can go enjoy the movie!!
>>
>> Time to reread Half Blood Prince before Deathly Hallows comes out.
>
>Done about 2 weeks ago.
Finished it last night. Can't believe that in a week, it'll all be
over...
-- Keith Gow --
|
