Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Homicide > Re: Harry Potte...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 9 Topic 791 of 865
Post > Topic >>

Re: Harry Potter 5

by Todd <twrexxnospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 9, 2007 at 07:41 PM

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:15:59 -0700, La Binsk <la_binsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Todd wrote:
>
>>
>> All in all, I think he did a fine job on OOTP.  The book
>> is ridiculously long and there's just no way to satisfy
>> everyone's wants in a two-hour-plus film.  My own
>> preference would have been to see St. Mungo's
>> Hospital but that too was left on the cutting room
>> floor.
>>
>
>Yaknow, moments like these remind me why I miss the old days of Deja -
>I liked that it would put the topics that had had the most recent
>activity up ahead of other topics.  That way, it was a lot easier to
>keep up with the conversation and to keep it going more smoothly.
>
>Anyway, moving back to the topic at hand - yes, the book is
>extraordinarily long but that makes it all the stranger to think that
>Movie 5 is the shortest of the Harry Potter movies to date.  They lost
>a lot of material in the process which helps to add context to the
>relation****ps and situations at hand.
>
>For instance, I, too would've loved a scene at St. Mungo's.  That
>would've brought up an excellent op****tunity for explaining why
>Neville would want to seek revenge upon Bellatrix Lestrange.  I'm not
>sure that it's clear to folks who haven't been reading the books, in
>addition to the movies, otherwise.
>
>Plus, I don't think that the movies have done that great a job of
>explaining why there is such enmity between the Marauders and Snape.
>They've touched on it somewhat - but only very briefly.  They need to
>go into fuller detail on this.
>
>One critic suggested that the movie could've done without the whole
>trial thing at the beginning of the movie.  He pointed out that after
>20 minutes, Harry ended up being in exactly the same position as
>before the trial.  That being the case, the filmmakers could've easily
>cut this part out and concentrated on other areas from the book
>instead.  The critic does have a point, methinks.
>
>One thing, though, in which the movies continue to do well is the
>casting of parts.  Imelda Staunton was terrific!  She made a rather
>terrifying figure in pink!
>
>La Binsk


She's one terrific actress, smiling all the time while she's pure evil
on the inside.  And as far as I know, she wasn't even a Death Eater,
was she?

Todd
 




 9 Posts in Topic:
Harry Potter 5
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2007-07-12 03:33:40 
Re: Harry Potter 5
"Loki Dog" <  2007-07-12 14:34:28 
Re: Harry Potter 5
invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-15 09:49:49 
Re: Harry Potter 5
La Binsk <la_binsk@[EM  2007-07-28 20:32:48 
Re: Harry Potter 5
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2007-08-02 09:25:42 
Re: Harry Potter 5
La Binsk <la_binsk@[EM  2007-08-09 19:15:59 
Re: Harry Potter 5
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2007-08-09 19:41:41 
Re: Harry Potter 5
Mel <melbella@[EMAIL P  2007-08-11 10:35:15 
Re: Harry Potter 5
La Binsk <la_binsk@[EM  2007-08-09 20:19:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 21:49:43 CDT 2008.