On 9 May 2007 10:40:58 -0700, "garciyalater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<garciyalater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 9, 1:00 pm, Bosco <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On 9 May 2007 09:53:59 -0700, "garciyala...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <garciyala...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> if you weren't so interested in winning an argument semantically you
>> >> might progress the conversation along, anyway it sounded to me like
>> >> "for the sake of argument" type statement. Get over it. You
haven't
>> >> discovered the smoking gun in the great rocknroma conspiracy- Hide
quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >no, he realy didnt answer the question. It is very simple. they
>> >scanned his pass****t. For any reason, they could have denied him from
>> >exiting the country. That is what it comes down to. He claims he did
>> >not have to seek permission. I pointed out he did. Explain to me if
>> >you can, could he have left if his pass****t were flagged? No? Then
>> >he needed the govts permission to leave the country.
>>
>> >Chuck
>>
>> " Interestingly, I just flew round trip Europe in March without having
>> to first gain permission. I have not been denied any freedom since
>> 9/11 that I enjoyed pre-9/11.
>>
>> So what's your point, pal? "
>>
>> Chuckie, his point is
>>
>> I have not been denied any freedom since
>> 9/11 that I enjoyed pre-9/11.
>>
>> since that was the original posters point, that he had- Hide quoted
text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>well no, his point was that he did not need his govts permission to
>leave the country. Which he did.
>Thats the problem with you rightwingers. You dont answer questions.
>You just keep going back to the parts that prove you argument, all the
>while ignoring that the parts that prove your arguemnt, are not what
>the subject of the query was.
>
>Chuck
uh ... like you just did Chuckie me boy ?
tell me a couple of things otay?
1) the website the guy listed ... you believe all that stuff? most?
some ? very little ? none?
2) after having read it do you believe him when he said ".. this is
neither a left-wing nor a right-wing web page"
If the guy or you were worried about a police state you should worry
about a few things closer to home. The SC ruled all property is owned
by the state (or any governmental body) and you are allowed to keep it
only as long as they don't want it. What are you doing to make sure
your state passes laws protecting your right to own property?
All these traffic cams, now just plain surveillance cams sprouting up
in every city, etc... they are being used for a bit more than simply
catching speeders, like tracking people
gov mandated gps locators in all cell phones
gov is thinking of mandated black boxes in all cars
Texas and NJ are going to MANDATE medication for EVERY female under
12, quite possibly and soon enough the rest of the US will also. Ha,
come on ..
|
