jl wrote:
> On May 19, 10:42 am, Useful Info <useful_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Read all about it, here:http://Muvy.org
>
>
> I saw that report and it's obvious that dragon skin provides more
> protection, while powerful interests have their stakes in maintaining
> the current body armor. Even the inventor of the current official
> body armor claims dragon skin will save more lives.
>
> But, hey, folks, isn't most everybody (other than neocons and their
> toadies) aware that the soldier is an expendible tool in warfare, as
> opposed to the quest for wealth and power?
>
No. That's why they developed body armor to begin with.
|
