----- Original Message -----
From: "Hunter" <buffhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups:
alt.tv.amazing-race,alt.tv.survivor,alt.tv.sopranos,alt.tv.iron-chef,alt.impeach.bush
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Professor Steven Jones explain why the Twin
Towers & WTC building 7 were brought down with explosives on
9/11.
> On Jun 19, 10:58 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
> <Dyy_Dumbyaa_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Hunter" <buffhun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message >> Those
>>
>> buildings were built to survive airplane crashes. And it
>> has
>>
>> >> been proven the fire retardent was still on the beams.
>> >> They didn't
>> >> melt. They were distorted by blunt force.
>> > ----
>> > They were build to withstand a hit by a significantly
>> > smaller Boeing
>> > 707 moving at a significantly slower speed than the much
>> > bigger 757
>> > moving at some 500 mph. And if there was no fire fueled
>> > by
>> > jet fuel
>> > and office furniture, equipment, carpets, etc. the
>> > buildings
>> > would had
>> > survived.
>>
>> > ---->Hunter
>>
>> What plane hit building seven and made it fall into its
>> footprint without damaging the buildings surrounding it
>> ****stain?
>>
>> peace
>> dawg
> ---
> World Trade Center 7 suffered heavy damage from the falling
> debris of
> buildings 1 and 2 and the fires that resulted which burned
> unchecked
> for about seven hours.
>
> --->Hunter
Falling debris? This shows how ignorant you are of simple
concepts like gravity. Falling objects are not projected
hundreds of feet and imbedded into buildings ****stain!
Unchecked burning has never caused a building to fall into its
footprint. You are surely a stupid ignorant ****wit or a ****ll
for the insiders who pulled it off ****er. Which is it.
peace
dawg
|
