"Hunter" <buffhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1182419414.517670.146230@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 20, 9:04 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
<Dyy_Dumbyaa_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hunter" <buffhun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Newsgroups:
>
alt.tv.amazing-race,alt.tv.survivor,alt.tv.sopranos,alt.tv.iron-chef,alt.impeach.bush
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Professor Steven Jones explain why the Twin
> Towers & WTC building 7 were brought down with explosives on
> 9/11.
>
> > On Jun 19, 10:58 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
> > <Dyy_Dumbyaa_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Hunter" <buffhun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message >>
> >> Those
>
> >> buildings were built to survive airplane crashes. And it
> >> has
>
> >> >> been proven the fire retardent was still on the beams.
> >> >> They didn't
> >> >> melt. They were distorted by blunt force.
> >> > ----
> >> > They were build to withstand a hit by a significantly
> >> > smaller Boeing
> >> > 707 moving at a significantly slower speed than the
> >> > much
> >> > bigger 757
> >> > moving at some 500 mph. And if there was no fire fueled
> >> > by
> >> > jet fuel
> >> > and office furniture, equipment, carpets, etc. the
> >> > buildings
> >> > would had
> >> > survived.
>
> >> > ---->Hunter
>
> >> What plane hit building seven and made it fall into its
> >> footprint without damaging the buildings surrounding it
> >> ****stain?
>
> >> peace
> >> dawg
> > ---
> > World Trade Center 7 suffered heavy damage from the
> > falling
> > debris of
> > buildings 1 and 2 and the fires that resulted which burned
> > unchecked
> > for about seven hours.
>
> > --->Hunter
>
> Falling debris? This shows how ignorant you are of simple
> concepts like gravity. Falling objects are not projected
> hundreds of feet and imbedded into buildings ****stain!
-----
World Trade Center 7 and the North Tower were only three
hundred feet
apart debris falling from about a quarter mile and being
thrown by the
force of the floors collapsing upon one another can easily
bridge that
gap. The photo of the South side of WTC 7 by the New York City
Police
in the link below shows it did. There is very substantial
structural
damage to the sw corner of WTC 7 starting from its 18th
floor down.
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7swd.jpg
Significant damage to the lower floors as the photo shows.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2116/144/1600/ViewofWTC7and1.jpg
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7s2.jpg
As you can see, from the scheme of things, the two buildings
are not
that far apart. Objects falling
at near terminal velocity from up to 1/4 mile up and being
blown out
by the force of the above collapsing
floors can easily cover a 300 foot gap.
>
> Unchecked burning has never caused a building to fall into
> its
> footprint. You are surely a stupid ignorant ****wit or a
> ****ll
> for the insiders who pulled it off ****er. Which is it.
----
In those cases the buildings did not also suffer extreme
structural
damage as well as the heat weakening the steel members. WTC
had diesel
fuel and natural gas to fuel the fires, not just office or
apartment
furniture, equipment and other things that would be found in a
home or
office. The 7-WTC fire burned in the bottom floors unchecked
for about
six to seven hours without the hindrance of the fire
department hosing
it down or the building's sprinkler system working. Steel
looses about
50% of its structural strength in temperatures of 1000 degrees
F. It
need not melt completely or the fire to burn hot enough to
actually
melt the steel to bring down a building. Add to the unusual
architecture of the building that put particularly heavy loads
on
parts of the building and it will come down. Cite a case in
which a
modern high rise steel structured building burned unchecked
for X
amount of hours please.
--->Hunter
Same old official story bull****. Building 7 fell into its
footprint all at once. This is not a normal collapse it is a
controled demolition. Any fool believing otherwise I feel
sorry for. You are nothing more than a ****ll for the official
story repeating the lies and probably paid to do so.
Why was the investigation not carried out on the first seven
stories and the top floor? Why was the investigation done
after the crime sceen was scrubbed. Why were gag orders issued
to those who felt explosions below the eighth floor prior to
WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapse. Why was controlled demolition not
even considered? Only a fool believes this crap ****er .
Plonk!
peace
dawg
|
