On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:02:19 -0500, Bosco <Bosco@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 13 Jul 2007 14:24:01 -0500, StinkyJohnson wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:21:07 GMT, "Steven L."
>><sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Useful Info wrote:
>>>> Hear it at http://Muvy.org
>>>
>>>It's amazing how people think they're living in an oppressive fascist
>>>dictator****p yet somehow manage to get full access to the media and the
>>>Internet to spread their message. They never realize how much of a
>>>contradiction that is.
>>
>>I don't see it as a contradiction at all. Who but the truly oppressed
>>are going to work hardest in order to GET their message out? The fact
>
>"work" ? WORK ??? you just post it to the ****ing world, what work
>was that ???
>
>>that the internet exists makes it much easier now to be hear but
>>internet access doesn't exist because of governmental largesse. The
>
>yes it does. When the government gets around to it, it will restrict
>the internet as it sees fit. In the meantime we do exist because of
>their largesse. Don't believe it ? I suggest you visit the "fairness
>doctrine." This little Orwellian doublespeak can be applied to
>anything seen fit, including the internet. Who is for the "fairness
>doctrine" ? Boxer and all the rest of the Demo's PLUS the EX-Dem
>Lott.
>
>>internet is available world wide and operates much to the chagrin of
>>truly repressive regimes, such as those in China and North Korea. In
>
>it doesn't operate in NK to anyone's chagrin. What makes you think
>people eating grass and tree bark are surfing the internet ?
>
>China isn't a warm fuzzy panda bear either. They arrest people on a
>daily basis for internet postings, etc. The internet isn't changing
>them.
>
>>our own country the people HAVE become more oppressed over the years,
>>there's no denying that. The passage of every bill into law either
>>limits, curtails, or ends something (a right, freedom, etc.) that once
>>existed. We may still be The Land Of The Free, we're just not as free
>>as we USED to be.......
>
>AMEND to that ...
>
>Sticking up for Boxer is sheer nonsense. The link given links to a
>thousand other links so I don't know what she said but I find it
>inconceivable to believe it wasn't a purely hysterical partisan rant
>which bears little relevance to actual problems.
>
>In short Boxer is an idiot, so is the entire left coast, so are all
>Demo's, Not that Repub's aren't either, just the others are bigger
>and better at it.
I was going to respond to your post point by point but upon reading
the last paragraph decided not to bother. I WILL respond to your
second to last paragraph, however, since it implies that I was
"sticking up for Boxer". The day I stick up for ANY politician you can
take me out back and shoot me, and I'll even supply the gun. I didn't
read the links either, because I had no interest in them. I was
responding to a nonsensical bull**** statement made by Steven L. in a
follow-up post. Of course, I wouldn't expect you to get that aspect of
your post right, either.....
|
