On 15 Jul 2007 00:23:01 -0500, StinkyJohnson wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:02:19 -0500, Bosco <Bosco@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On 13 Jul 2007 14:24:01 -0500, StinkyJohnson wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:21:07 GMT, "Steven L."
>>><sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Useful Info wrote:
>>>>> Hear it at http://Muvy.org
>>>>
>>>>It's amazing how people think they're living in an oppressive fascist
>>>>dictator****p yet somehow manage to get full access to the media and
the
>>>>Internet to spread their message. They never realize how much of a
>>>>contradiction that is.
>>>
>>>I don't see it as a contradiction at all. Who but the truly oppressed
>>>are going to work hardest in order to GET their message out? The fact
>>
>>"work" ? WORK ??? you just post it to the ****ing world, what work
>>was that ???
>>
>>>that the internet exists makes it much easier now to be hear but
>>>internet access doesn't exist because of governmental largesse. The
>>
>>yes it does. When the government gets around to it, it will restrict
>>the internet as it sees fit. In the meantime we do exist because of
>>their largesse. Don't believe it ? I suggest you visit the "fairness
>>doctrine." This little Orwellian doublespeak can be applied to
>>anything seen fit, including the internet. Who is for the "fairness
>>doctrine" ? Boxer and all the rest of the Demo's PLUS the EX-Dem
>>Lott.
>>
>>>internet is available world wide and operates much to the chagrin of
>>>truly repressive regimes, such as those in China and North Korea. In
>>
>>it doesn't operate in NK to anyone's chagrin. What makes you think
>>people eating grass and tree bark are surfing the internet ?
>>
>>China isn't a warm fuzzy panda bear either. They arrest people on a
>>daily basis for internet postings, etc. The internet isn't changing
>>them.
>>
>>>our own country the people HAVE become more oppressed over the years,
>>>there's no denying that. The passage of every bill into law either
>>>limits, curtails, or ends something (a right, freedom, etc.) that once
>>>existed. We may still be The Land Of The Free, we're just not as free
>>>as we USED to be.......
>>
>>AMEND to that ...
>>
>>Sticking up for Boxer is sheer nonsense. The link given links to a
>>thousand other links so I don't know what she said but I find it
>>inconceivable to believe it wasn't a purely hysterical partisan rant
>>which bears little relevance to actual problems.
>>
>>In short Boxer is an idiot, so is the entire left coast, so are all
>>Demo's, Not that Repub's aren't either, just the others are bigger
>>and better at it.
>
>I was going to respond to your post point by point but upon reading
>the last paragraph decided not to bother. I WILL respond to your
>second to last paragraph, however, since it implies that I was
>"sticking up for Boxer". The day I stick up for ANY politician you can
>take me out back and shoot me, and I'll even supply the gun. I didn't
>read the links either, because I had no interest in them. I was
>responding to a nonsensical bull**** statement made by Steven L. in a
>follow-up post. Of course, I wouldn't expect you to get that aspect of
>your post right, either.....
ya whatever, you're as big a moron as fargo or forge or whatever his
****ing nick is ..
you're the one that has it assbackwards which is prolly the only thing
oppressed about you is your faggot ass
you stuck up for boxer by making lameo excuses
oh yea, one last thing
you can't respond point by point because there isn't a signal one in
error. I may have slightly mischaracterized you opinion but facts are
facts which makes things like the internet is opening China and North
****ing KOREA !!! pure hysterical bull****. Clicking a mouse button
is "WORK" by the oppressed ??? oh plzzzz
|
