"David E. Powell" <David_Powell3006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:63d18b09-6103-41f0-91d6-bdf3728c895f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 9, 3:50 pm, "Jeremy Q." <q...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:e414af78-4bf3-
>> 46f7-b29b-fded6c3f9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > The 9/11 "internal demolition" conspiracy theorists have their
>> > heads in the sand when it comes to reality.
>>
>> It's seven years after the fact and you're *still* replying to every
>> 9/11 conspiracy thread that gets xposted to risparew. There's clearly
>> something
>
>> about the issue that has captured your imagination, just as it has
>> theirs.
>
>
> Because someone has to point out fallacy lest future people believe
> the nonsese. It is the same reason there are organizations dedicated
> to record keeping about the Holocaust, the Nanking massacre, etc.
Someone has to joust those giants, or they'll ravage the land!
Future people aren't likely to see any of your replies. The most likely
way they'll encounter the text of the original article is as an
abbreviated, acontextual search result. And really, the idea that
crossposted Usenet trolls will be given consideration over official
re****ts and evidence by people in the future is just silly.
Stop your nonsense.
|
