Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Tv Joan-of-arcadia > Re: God Declare...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 38 of 51 Topic 156 of 279
Post > Topic >>

Re: God Declares SP**** On Big Steve . . .

by never@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (MrSpook) Jan 31, 2005 at 11:06 PM

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:08:28 GMT, "Laura Ware"
<bookwormlady@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>"MrSpook" <never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:421966e9.353137421@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:19:57 GMT, "Laura Ware"
>> <bookwormlady@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>"MrSpook" <never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:4203e7c4.320584020@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unidentified voice says, "Be my b*tch".
>>>
	LOL!

	I just noticed where you censored Steve's favorite quote.

	Isn't that a tad . . . disrespectful?


>>>Spook, I pray that if a day comes when someone I consider an enemy
p*****
>>>away, I handle it with a lot more class and compassion then you are
>>>showing
>>>at the moment.
>>
>> That *would* be quite a feat, I'm sure.
>
>Apparently it was too much of an effort for you to make.
>
>>>Is there an ounce of kindness in your soul?  Would it kill you under
these
>>>cir***stances to display some of it?  Or are you bound and determined
to
>>>confirm the opinion of some that you don't have any redeeming
qualities?
>>>
>>>
>> Funny, isn't it, how over the years you have so consistently
>> failed to ask Steve these very same questions?
>
>And you believe you are privy to every conversation I ever had with Steve

>because...?
>
><snip rest>
>
< Oh, no.  Let's put it back . . . 'cause it's VERY im****tant >

          *          *          *

	Too bad.  Every one of you let him go on and on instead, and
the end result is his eternal inability to make any amends for some of
the nasty, false, and vicious things he has done to and said about
others.  In that respect, you've repeatedly missed your own perfect
chance to make a difference in how he would ultimately be remembered
by quite a number of people who knew him.

	But even so, when all is said and done, he and he alone was
responsible for the consequences of his own bad behavior.

	Deal with it.


          *          *          *


>Spook, consider this:
>At this point, you have started a flame war by ignoring basic etiquitte
and 
>slandering a dead man.


	Have I?  Or is that just the spin you'd like to put on it?

	Let me tell you something, Yer Holiness:

	It ain't "slander" (or here, more properly, "libel") when it
happens to be true.

	No, you poor misguided soul.  What I am doing is simply
stating the way I feel.  And I have every right to express my opinion,
whether you like it or not.  Personally, I couldn't care less.

	Now, what you are doing, and I do mean that collectively . . .


	(So gather all the little piggies around the fire here so
everyone can listen . . . 'mmKay?)

	< Ahem >

	What YOU are doing, and have been doing for years on end with
the help and gleeful participation of Big Fat-Headed Steve himself and
the other fat-headed fawks in here is to make up a ponderous string of
vicious lies and twisted half-truths to maliciously slander and libel
ME simply because YOU didn't like some of the things I've had to say.

	Period.


>  In doing so you have gotten a truckload of attention.


	So I'm popular.  What's your point?


>  You have also angered and hurt a number of people, some whom 
>have admittedly lost their tempers and said inappropriate things in
return. 


	Wow.  Can that really happen on Usenet?


>I am sure that pleases you to no end.


	Speak for yourself.


>However, this flame war will die, as all flame wars do sooner or later. 


	I'm sure you'll all find a "good" reason to have another one.


>Those you have angered will calm down and/or get tired of messing with
you 
>and move on.


	**** them.  Like I should give a rat's ass.


>You will once again be ignored.  


	"I'm" being ignored?  Since when???

	LOL!

	And here I thought all this time that "I" was ignoring "YOU".

	Silly me.


>Those who liked and mourned 
>Steve before you posted will still like and mourn him afterwards.


	Please . . . by all means . . . knock yourselves out.


>On the 
>other hand, by one vicious and unnecessary act, you have given your
enemies 
>evidence that you are all they have claimed you were and done more damage
to 
>your reputation on Usenet than anyone else, INCLUDING Steve, could ever 
>accomplish.


	Too bad he didn't live quite long enough attain his goal, huh?


>In the end, what have you gained?
>

	The ability to tell YOU . . . and that means ALL of you . . .

	(You know who you are.)

that by your actions as well as your inactions, you aided, abetted,
and even encouraged Steve Christianson to leave this world as "Big
Fat-Headed Asshole Steve", instead of "Big Loved By Everyone Steve".

	In spite of all of your lofty, saccharin-coated bull****
platitudes, the stench of the ****d truth is this:  YOU allowed him to
die without any chance of reclamation.

	The choice was yours, and his, to make.

	All of you chose wrongly.

	And now it's too late to make a difference.

	Huh!  Some "friends" YOU turned out to be.

	Now you know why I just had to laugh.
 




 51 Posts in Topic:
God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-01-30 13:57:52 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Night_Spirit"   2005-01-30 09:37:11 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Night_Spirit"   2005-01-30 09:44:46 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Micah" <rif  2005-01-30 10:30:17 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Night_Spirit"   2005-01-30 10:43:56 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Micah" <rif  2005-01-30 15:03:12 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
kenpisano@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2005-02-11 09:33:35 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Tim Bruening <tsbrueni  2005-02-01 02:29:04 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"EvilBill" <  2005-01-30 14:48:29 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Magda <sourisverte@[EM  2005-01-30 16:38:07 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Night_Spirit"   2005-01-30 10:47:27 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Magda <sourisverte@[EM  2005-01-30 17:05:30 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
DaveJohnson12@[EMAIL PROT  2005-01-30 18:01:42 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
DaveJohnson12@[EMAIL PROT  2005-01-30 18:04:16 
Re: God Declares SPNAK . . .
"somebody" <  2005-01-30 15:59:28 
Re: God Declares SPNAK . . .
Magda <sourisverte@[EM  2005-01-30 17:06:45 
Re: God Declares SPNAK . . .
"EvilBill" <  2005-01-31 19:31:35 
Re: God Declares SPNAK . . .
"WickeddollŽ" &  2005-01-31 17:03:44 
God wipes His ass and Lo: There is Mr. Skook
"Bozo the Evil Klown  2005-01-30 08:34:19 
Re: God wipes His ass and Lo: There is Mr. Skook
"WickeddollŽ" &  2005-01-30 16:52:30 
Re: God wipes His ass and Lo: There is Mr. Skook
"EvilBill" <  2005-01-31 19:21:32 
Re: God wipes His ass and Lo: There is Mr. Skook
"WickeddollŽ" &  2005-01-31 17:04:37 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Lio Convoy <lioconvoy@  2005-01-30 19:12:02 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
KStahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL   2005-01-30 15:32:07 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Magda <sourisverte@[EM  2005-01-30 22:00:11 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Lio Convoy <lioconvoy@  2005-01-30 21:49:37 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
KStahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL   2005-01-30 20:09:21 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
KStahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL   2005-01-30 20:10:47 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll him in flour &
sourceX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-01-31 03:17:55 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll him in flour &
"Brenda" <in  2005-01-31 06:02:12 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll him in flour &
sourceX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-01-31 04:47:29 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll Spook in flour
"Brenda" <in  2005-01-31 17:49:42 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll Spook in flour
"Lisa" <lisa  2005-01-31 22:44:26 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll Spook in flour
"Brenda" <in  2005-01-31 18:19:22 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll Spook in flour
Julianna Feigl <glacie  2005-02-09 20:26:16 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Brenda. . . << her "Chicken of the
Bewitched@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2005-01-31 23:30:10 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . . << roll him in flour &
"EvilBill" <  2005-01-31 19:22:45 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-01-31 23:06:02 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Night_Spirit"   2005-01-31 18:57:52 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Lisa" <lisa  2005-02-01 00:47:42 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Brenda" <in  2005-01-31 20:19:26 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
BTR1701 <btr1702@[EMAI  2005-01-31 20:47:12 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Lio Convoy <lioconvoy@  2005-02-01 05:28:59 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Bewitched@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2005-01-31 23:45:39 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-02-01 00:13:04 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
never@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-02-01 00:56:16 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Lio Convoy <lioconvoy@  2005-02-01 05:27:15 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Lio Convoy <lioconvoy@  2005-02-01 05:25:19 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
"Bozo the Evil Klown  2005-01-31 17:10:21 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
kev <kev@[EMAIL PROTEC  2005-01-31 20:20:18 
Re: God Declares SPNAK On Big Steve . . .
Louis M. Brown <phypho  2005-02-01 02:12:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 22:23:37 CST 2008.