EGK wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 15:11:34 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>EGK wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:57:38 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>John Richards wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The Republicans are anti-religion/anti-church? I think you have that
>>>>>backwards.
>>>>>If you read the book of Revelation, it clearly indicates that a UN
type
>>>>>world government will take over, with rigid, socialistic controls.
>>>>>The last Democrat candidate lost (in part) by leaning toward
socialism,
>>>>>and by suggesting that we get UN approval before doing anything in
the
>>>>>realm of foreign affairs.
>>>>
>>>>You're making this up as you go along, right? I mean, everyone knows
>>>>that you can't be serious with this mumbo jumbo. I realize that most
of
>>>>you right-wingers get your ideas from Limbaugh/Savage/Coulter and that
>>>>the official party line is that you are not allowed to think for
>>>>yourself (hence your sup****t for collectivism), but you first need to
>>>>understand that the so-called bible is just a collection of myths,
>>>>legends, fairy tales and campfire stories that were passed on through
>>>>generations by story tellers. It was never intended to be taken
>>>>seriously, but the people of the past never imagined that the world
>>>>would ever spawn a bunch of religious nutters who would actually
>>>>pronounce these stores to be factual. What makes matters even worse is
>>>>that you then built a religion on a teenage girls who whores around
and
>>>>manages to get herself knocked up and blames it on some ghost and says
>>>>proclaims that her son is a deity. What a bunch of malarkey.
>>>>
>>>>The Democratic loss had nothing to do with socialism. That idea only
>>>>exists in the minds of a few narrow-minded individuals who need a
>>>>scapegoat for their own failings. They can't admit that they have
never
>>>>ever contributed anything positive to the Unites States so by blaming
>>>>others they can forgive their own faults. Why don't you act like a man
>>>>and admit that Republicans are only out to tear down the United
States?
>>>>They are already selling it off piece by piece and pretty soon more of
>>>>the United States will be owned by foreign investors then by people
who
>>>>live here.
>>>
>>>
>>>This is the kind of moronic liberal bull**** that forces conservative
>>>centrists to sup****t the religious right even if they're not at all
>>>religious. For all the ranting from the left about how the right is
rigid,
>>>condescending and controlling, all they have to do is look at posts
from
>>>people like you.
>>>
>>>It's sheer arrogance to use words like "everyone knows", "the minds of
a
>>>few narrow-minded individuals", or "why don't you act like a man". It
just
>>>confirms my belief the extremes of the left and right are much more
alike
>>>than different. You certainly don't seem to have any acceptance for
>>>opinions differing from your own. Certainly no different from the holy
>>>rollers on the right.
>>
>>People are allowed to believe their narrow religious bigoted ideas, but
>>they don't have the right to expect everyone else to accept that they
>>are natural truths. The bible has been debunked systematically by people
>>who are experts in religion, history, archeology and anthropology. The
>>religious right just won't accept that there is incontrovertible
>>evidence that the xtian religion is no more valid then any other
>>religion. You speak of arrogance and yet you practice it far greater
>>then I do by rising up on your high horse and pontificating as if you
>>have a valid basis for your arguments. No wonder I don't like religious
>>people very much.
>
>
> You apparently can't read very well. I'm far from religious but it
doesn't
> surprise me that you try to pigion-hole me as just another
"right-winger".
> I'm agnostic myself. It's just that reading posts from people like you
it
> confirms my beliefs that you're just like those you condemn.
>
> I personally feel much more threatened by liberals like you who want to
tell
> me how I (and everyone else) should think.
>
> When religious nuts ask me if i'm going to heaven or hell, I always
answer
> "I'm easy really, I have friends in both places". When idiot, PC
liberals
> like yourself start telling me what I should think and believe on this
plain
> of existence, I answer with a hearty **** YOU.
But only because you are crude instead of intelligent. I didn't have to
resort to profanity to make my point. You apparently felt it was
necessary to make yours. I feel sorry for those who cannot debate based
on facts and logic rather then profanity. Which is another reason I
suspect you are a right-winger since that seems to be a favorite tool of
the right. Especially since............ Oh well, forget it. Everyone
else gets the point.
|
