On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:16:40 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>EGK wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 15:11:34 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>EGK wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:57:38 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>John Richards wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>The Republicans are anti-religion/anti-church? I think you have that
>>>>>>backwards.
>>>>>>If you read the book of Revelation, it clearly indicates that a UN
type
>>>>>>world government will take over, with rigid, socialistic controls.
>>>>>>The last Democrat candidate lost (in part) by leaning toward
socialism,
>>>>>>and by suggesting that we get UN approval before doing anything in
the
>>>>>>realm of foreign affairs.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're making this up as you go along, right? I mean, everyone knows
>>>>>that you can't be serious with this mumbo jumbo. I realize that most
of
>>>>>you right-wingers get your ideas from Limbaugh/Savage/Coulter and
that
>>>>>the official party line is that you are not allowed to think for
>>>>>yourself (hence your sup****t for collectivism), but you first need to
>>>>>understand that the so-called bible is just a collection of myths,
>>>>>legends, fairy tales and campfire stories that were passed on through
>>>>>generations by story tellers. It was never intended to be taken
>>>>>seriously, but the people of the past never imagined that the world
>>>>>would ever spawn a bunch of religious nutters who would actually
>>>>>pronounce these stores to be factual. What makes matters even worse
is
>>>>>that you then built a religion on a teenage girls who whores around
and
>>>>>manages to get herself knocked up and blames it on some ghost and
says
>>>>>proclaims that her son is a deity. What a bunch of malarkey.
>>>>>
>>>>>The Democratic loss had nothing to do with socialism. That idea only
>>>>>exists in the minds of a few narrow-minded individuals who need a
>>>>>scapegoat for their own failings. They can't admit that they have
never
>>>>>ever contributed anything positive to the Unites States so by blaming
>>>>>others they can forgive their own faults. Why don't you act like a
man
>>>>>and admit that Republicans are only out to tear down the United
States?
>>>>>They are already selling it off piece by piece and pretty soon more
of
>>>>>the United States will be owned by foreign investors then by people
who
>>>>>live here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This is the kind of moronic liberal bull**** that forces conservative
>>>>centrists to sup****t the religious right even if they're not at all
>>>>religious. For all the ranting from the left about how the right is
rigid,
>>>>condescending and controlling, all they have to do is look at posts
from
>>>>people like you.
>>>>
>>>>It's sheer arrogance to use words like "everyone knows", "the minds
of a
>>>>few narrow-minded individuals", or "why don't you act like a man".
It just
>>>>confirms my belief the extremes of the left and right are much more
alike
>>>>than different. You certainly don't seem to have any acceptance for
>>>>opinions differing from your own. Certainly no different from the
holy
>>>>rollers on the right.
>>>
>>>People are allowed to believe their narrow religious bigoted ideas, but
>>>they don't have the right to expect everyone else to accept that they
>>>are natural truths. The bible has been debunked systematically by
people
>>>who are experts in religion, history, archeology and anthropology. The
>>>religious right just won't accept that there is incontrovertible
>>>evidence that the xtian religion is no more valid then any other
>>>religion. You speak of arrogance and yet you practice it far greater
>>>then I do by rising up on your high horse and pontificating as if you
>>>have a valid basis for your arguments. No wonder I don't like religious
>>>people very much.
>>
>>
>> You apparently can't read very well. I'm far from religious but it
doesn't
>> surprise me that you try to pigion-hole me as just another
"right-winger".
>> I'm agnostic myself. It's just that reading posts from people like you
it
>> confirms my beliefs that you're just like those you condemn.
>>
>> I personally feel much more threatened by liberals like you who want to
tell
>> me how I (and everyone else) should think.
>>
>> When religious nuts ask me if i'm going to heaven or hell, I always
answer
>> "I'm easy really, I have friends in both places". When idiot, PC
liberals
>> like yourself start telling me what I should think and believe on this
plain
>> of existence, I answer with a hearty **** YOU.
>
>But only because you are crude instead of intelligent. I didn't have to
>resort to profanity to make my point. You apparently felt it was
>necessary to make yours. I feel sorry for those who cannot debate based
>on facts and logic rather then profanity. Which is another reason I
>suspect you are a right-winger since that seems to be a favorite tool of
>the right. Especially since............ Oh well, forget it. Everyone
>else gets the point.
I would hope they get the point. The point being that you're just as
bigoted and arrogant as anyone you condemn. A crude remark is all you
deserve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
- (Calvin and Hobbes)
|
