Re: The Devil On JOA!?

"kstahl" <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e8SdnbWkMMIPEfffRVn-rQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Richards wrote:
>> The Republicans are anti-religion/anti-church? I think you have that 
>> backwards.
>> If you read the book of Revelation, it clearly indicates that a UN type
>> world government will take over, with rigid, socialistic controls.
>> The last Democrat candidate lost (in part) by leaning toward socialism,
>> and by suggesting that we get UN approval before doing anything in the 
>> realm of foreign affairs.
> 
> You're making this up as you go along, right? I mean, everyone knows 
> that you can't be serious with this mumbo jumbo. 

Who is this "everyone"? Certainly not the majority of the American people
who voted in the last election.

Mumbo jumbo? Denigrating your opponent's viewpoint without offering
a point-by-point logical rebuttal is nothing but a cheap parlor trick, the
last defense of scoundrels.

>  I realize that most of 
> you right-wingers get your ideas from Limbaugh/Savage/Coulter and that 
> the official party line is that you are not allowed to think for 
> yourself (hence your sup****t for collectivism), but you first need to

I developed my conservative philosophy in the 1960's, long before 
Limbaugh/Savage/Coulter appeared on the scene. These spokespersons
are merely the latest voice of the 'silent' majority. They're not creating
any new "ideas", just defending what the mainstream believes in.
 
> understand that the so-called bible is just a collection of myths, 
> legends, fairy tales and campfire stories that were passed on through 
> generations by story tellers. It was never intended to be taken 
> seriously, but the people of the past never imagined that the world 
> would ever spawn a bunch of religious nutters who would actually 
> pronounce these stores to be factual. What makes matters even worse is 
> that you then built a religion on a teenage girls who whores around and 
> manages to get herself knocked up and blames it on some ghost and says 
> proclaims that her son is a deity. What a bunch of malarkey.

Now your real agenda comes out. You're nothing but a hater of
Christianity and what the Bible stands for. Count yourself among a
very small minority in this country.
 
> The Democratic loss had nothing to do with socialism. That idea only 
> exists in the minds of a few narrow-minded individuals who need a 
> scapegoat for their own failings. They can't admit that they have never 
> ever contributed anything positive to the Unites States so by blaming 
> others they can forgive their own faults. Why don't you act like a man 
> and admit that Republicans are only out to tear down the United States? 
> They are already selling it off piece by piece and pretty soon more of 
> the United States will be owned by foreign investors then by people who 
> live here.

You say "the Democratic loss had nothing to do with socialism." 
But you don't offer an alternative reason for the Democratic party's loss.
Why do you suppose the majority were opposed to Kerry's platform?

-- 
John Richards