Re: The Devil On JOA!?

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:43:16 GMT, "John Richards"
<jr70@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>"kstahl" <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e8SdnbWkMMIPEfffRVn-rQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> John Richards wrote:
>>> The Republicans are anti-religion/anti-church? I think you have that 
>>> backwards.
>>> If you read the book of Revelation, it clearly indicates that a UN
type
>>> world government will take over, with rigid, socialistic controls.
>>> The last Democrat candidate lost (in part) by leaning toward
socialism,
>>> and by suggesting that we get UN approval before doing anything in the

>>> realm of foreign affairs.
>> 
>> You're making this up as you go along, right? I mean, everyone knows 
>> that you can't be serious with this mumbo jumbo. 
>
>Who is this "everyone"? Certainly not the majority of the American people
>who voted in the last election.
>
>Mumbo jumbo? Denigrating your opponent's viewpoint without offering
>a point-by-point logical rebuttal is nothing but a cheap parlor trick

How can one logically rebutt a blatant lie like "the last Democrat
candidate leaned toward socialism and suggested we get UN approval
before doing anything in the realm of foreign affairs"?